Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32192206›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Affordability and Availability of Child Restraints in an Under-Served Population in South Africa.

Prasanthi Puvanachandra, Aliasgher Janmohammed, Pumla Mtambeka, Megan Prinsloo, Sebastian Van As, Margaret M Peden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Prasanthi PuvanachandraThe George Institute for Global Health UK, Oxford University, OX1 2BQ Oxford, UK.
Aliasgher JanmohammedChildSafe South Africa, Woolworths ChildSafe Research and Educational Centre, Red Cross Children's Hospital, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.
Pumla MtambekaChildSafe South Africa, Woolworths ChildSafe Research and Educational Centre, Red Cross Children's Hospital, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.
Megan PrinslooBurden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Hospital, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa.
Sebastian Van AsRed Cross Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.
Margaret M PedenThe George Institute for Global Health UK, Oxford University, OX1 2BQ Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChild road traffic injuries are a major global public health problem and the issue is particularly burdensome in middle-income countries such as South Africa where injury death rates are 41 per 100,000 for under 5's and 24.5 per 100,000 for 5-14-year-old. Despite their known effectiveness in reducing injuries amongst children, the rates of use of child restraint systems (CRS) remains low in South Africa. Little is known about barriers to child restraint use especially in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsWe carried out observation studies and parent/carer surveys in 7 suburbs of Cape Town over a three month period to assess usage rates and explore the knowledge and perceptions of parents towards child restraint legislation, ownership and cost; Results: Only 7.8% of child passengers were observed to be properly restrained in a CRS with driver seatbelt use and single child occupancy being associated with higher child restraint use. 92% of survey respondents claimed to have knowledge of current child restraint legislation, however, only 32% of those parents/carers were able to correctly identify the age requirements and penalty. Reasons given for not owning a child seat included high cost and the belief that seatbelts were a suitable alternative.

conclusionsThese findings indicate the need for a tighter legislation with an increased fine paired with enhanced enforcement of both adult seatbelt and child restraint use. The provision of low-cost/subsidised CRS or borrowing schemes and targeted social marketing through online fora, well baby clinics, early learning centres would be beneficial in increasing ownership and use of CRS.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficChild Restraint SystemsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFamilyHumansInfantMedically Underserved AreaSeat BeltsSouth Africaaffordabilityavailabilitychild injurypassengersrestraints

Identifiers

PMID32192206
PMCPMC7143186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.