ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020
Twenty Years of Cerebral Ultrasound Perfusion Imaging-Is the Best yet to Come?
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05893407 (Quantification of Cerebral Perfusion at the Patient's Bedside When Performing Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Neurointensive Care Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Quantification of Cerebral Perfusion at the Patient's Bedside When Performing Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Neurointensive Care Patients
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Qualitative to Quantitative Functional Assessment in Stroke Rehabilitation with a Focus on Ultrasound Role.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Alterations in Regional Brain Microcirculation in Patients with Sepsis: A Prospective Study Using Contrast-Enhanced Brain Ultrasound.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- Transcranial ultrasound localization microscopy in moyamoya patients using a clinical ultrasound system.Theranostics · 2025Article
- CT perfusion imaging in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. State of the art.Frontiers in radiology · 2024Review
- A concise guide to transtemporal contrast-enhanced ultrasound in children.Journal of ultrasound · 2023Review
- Age Is Only a Number Also in Hyperacute Stroke Care-But Not an Irrelevant One.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Advances in translational imaging of the microcirculation.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2021Review
- Updates in Stroke Treatment, Diagnostic Methods and Predictors of Outcome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, ultrasonic cerebral perfusion imaging (UPI) has been introduced and validated applying different data acquisition and processing approaches. Clinical data were collected mainly in acute stroke patients. Some efforts were undertaken in order to compare different technical settings and validate results to gold standard perfusion imaging. This review illustrates the evolution of the method, explicating different technical aspects and milestones achieved over time. Up to date, advancements of ultrasound technology as well as data processing approaches enable semi-quantitative, gold standard proven identification of critically hypo-perfused tissue in acute stroke patients. The rapid distribution of CT perfusion over the past 10 years has limited the clinical need for UPI. However, the unexcelled advantage of mobile application raises reasonable expectations for future applications. Since the identification of intracerebral hematoma and large vessel occlusion can also be revealed by ultrasound exams, UPI is a supplementary multi-modal imaging technique with the potential of pre-hospital application. Some further applications are outlined to highlight the future potential of this underrated bedside method of microcirculatory perfusion assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.