Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32191943›Full record

ArticlePublic health genomics2020

Illustrating Cancer Risk: Patient Risk Communication Preferences and Interest regarding a Novel BRCA1/2 Genetic Risk Modifier Test.

Jada G Hamilton, Margaux Genoff Garzon, Ibrahim H Shah, Kechna Cadet, Elyse Shuk, Joy S Westerman, Jennifer L Hay, Kenneth Offit, Mark E Robson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Community engagement in the development of health-related data visualizations: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Perspectives of diverse Spanish- and English-speaking patients on the clinical use of polygenic risk scores.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jada G HamiltonDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA, hamiltoj@mskcc.org.
Margaux Genoff GarzonDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ibrahim H ShahDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Kechna CadetDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Elyse ShukDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Joy S WestermanDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jennifer L HayDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Kenneth OffitDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mark E RobsonDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Responses to Genetic Risk Modifier Testing Among Women with BRCA1/2 MutationsR21CA230879 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HAMILTON, JADA GABRIELLE · 2018 to 2019
$414k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R21 CA230879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGenetic risk modifier testing (GRMT), an emerging form of genetic testing based on common single nucleotide polymorphisms and polygenic risk scores, has the potential to refine estimates of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers' breast cancer risks. However, for women to benefit from GRMT, effective approaches for communicating this novel risk information are needed.

objectiveTo evaluate patient preferences regarding risk communication materials for GRMT.

methodsWe developed four separate presentations (panel of genes, icon array, verbal risk estimate, graphical risk estimate) of hypothetical GRMT results, each using varying risk communication strategies to convey different information elements including number of risk modifier variants present, variant prevalence among BRCA1/2 carriers, and implications and uncertainties of test results for cancer risk. Thirty BRCA1/2 carriers evaluated these materials (randomized to low, moderate, or high breast cancer risk versions). Qualitative and quantitative data were obtained through in-person interviews.

resultsAcross risk versions, participants preferred the presentation of the graphical risk estimate, often in combination with the verbal risk estimate. Interest in GRMT was high; 76.7% of participants wanted their own GRMT. Participants valued the potential for GRMT to clarify their cancer susceptibility and provide actionable information. Many (65.5%) anticipated that GRMT would make risk management decisions easier.

conclusionsWomen with BRCA1/2 mutations could be highly receptive to GRMT, and the minimal amount of necessary information to be included in result risk communication materials includes graphical and verbal estimates of future cancer risk. Findings will inform clinical translation of GRMT in a manner consistent with patients' preferences.

Indexed as

Data DisplayData VisualizationHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeInformation LiteracyFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceRisk AssessmentGenetic testingHereditary breast and ovarian cancerPolygenic risk scoreQualitative methodsRisk communication

Identifiers

PMID32191943
PMCPMC7272266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.