Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32191806›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2020

Heterogeneous impact of cytomegalovirus reactivation on nonrelapse mortality in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Satoshi Kaito, Yujiro Nakajima, Konan Hara, Takashi Toya, Tetsuya Nishida, Naoyuki Uchida, Junichi Mukae, Takahiro Fukuda, Yukiyasu Ozawa, Masatsugu Tanaka and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Satoshi KaitoHematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yujiro NakajimaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Konan HaraHematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi ToyaHematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuya NishidaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Naoyuki UchidaDepartment of Hematology, Federation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Junichi MukaeHematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro FukudaDepartment of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukiyasu OzawaDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya First Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Masatsugu TanakaDepartment of Hematology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kazuhiro IkegameDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Yuta KatayamaDepartment of Hematology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Takuro KuriyamaDepartment of Hematology, Hamanomachi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Junya KandaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshiko AtsutaJapanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Nagoya, Japan.
Masao OgataDepartment of Hematology, Oita University Hospital, Oita, Japan; and.
Ayumi TaguchiGynecology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuteru OhashiHematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JPHamanomachi Hospital · JPHiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital · JPHyogo Medical University · JPKanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization · JPKyoto first Red Cross hospital · JPKyoto University · JPNagoya University · JPOita University Hospital · JPThe Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation · JPTohoku University · JPToranomon Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major complication in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The utility of CMV prophylaxis with letermovir has been reported; however, the specific applications remain unclear. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed large-scale registry data (N = 10 480) to clarify the risk factors for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in connection with CMV reactivation. First, we identified risk factors for CMV reactivation using multivariate analysis and developed a scoring model. Although the model effectively stratified reactivation risk into 3 groups (43.7% vs 60.9% vs 71.5%; P < .001), the 3-year NRM was significantly higher in patients with CMV reactivation, even in the low (20.9% vs 13.0%, P < .001), intermediate (21.4% vs 15.6%; P < .001), and high (29.3% vs 18.0%; P < .001) reactivation risk groups. Next, survival analysis considering competing risks, time-dependent covariates, and interaction terms for exploring the heterogeneous impact of CMV reactivation on NRM in the training cohort revealed that chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.96; P = .033), good performance status (PS) (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.04-1.94; P = .028), HLA-matched donor (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.70; P = .013), and standard-risk disease (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.04-1.58; P = .022) were associated with increased NRM. In the test cohort, CMV reactivation was significantly associated with increased 3-year NRM among patients with 2 to 4 factors (22.1% vs 13.1%; P < .001) but was comparable among patients with 0 or 1 factor (23.2% vs 20.4%; P = .62). We propose that CMV prophylaxis should be determined based on reactivation risk, as well as these other factors.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationCytomegalovirusHumansRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID32191806
PMCPMC7094017
OpenAlexW3011672250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.