Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32191758›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Mbale Hospital, Eastern Uganda.

Julius Nteziyaremye, Stanley Jacob Iramiot, Rebecca Nekaka, Milton W Musaba, Julius Wandabwa, Enoch Kisegerwa, Paul Kiondo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Septicemia caused bySAGE open medical case reports · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julius NteziyaremyeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Stanley Jacob IramiotDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Rebecca NekakaDepartment of Community and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Milton W MusabaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Julius WandabwaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Enoch KisegerwaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Paul KiondoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-8049-8843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy (ASBP) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as pyelonephritis, preterm or low birth weight delivery if untreated. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria, the isolated bacterial agents, and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns in pregnant women attending antenatal care at Mbale Hospital.

methodsThis was a cross sectional study in which 587 pregnant women with no symptoms and signs of urinary tract infection were recruited from January to March 2019. Mid-stream clean catch urine samples were collected from the women using sterile containers. The urine samples were cultured using standard laboratory methods. The bacterial colonies were identified and antibiotic sensitivity was done using disc diffusion method. Chi squared tests and logistic regression were done to identify factors associated with asymptomatic bacteriuria. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsOut of the 587 pregnant women, 22 (3.75%) tested positive for asymptomatic bacteriuria. Women aged 20-24 years were less likely to have ASBP when compared to women aged less than 20 years (AOR = 0.14, 95%CI 0.02-0.95, P = 0.004). The most common isolates in descending order were E. coli (n = 13, 46.4%) and S.aureus (n = 9, 32.1%). Among the gram negative isolates, the highest sensitivity was to gentamycin (82.4%) and imipenem (82.4%). The gram positive isolates were sensitive to gentamycin (90.9%) followed by imipenem (81.8%). All the isolates were resistant to sulphamethoxazole with trimethoprim (100%). Multidrug resistance was 82.4% among gram negative isolates and 72.4% among the gram positive isolates.

conclusionThere was high resistance to the most commonly used antibiotics. There is need to do urine culture and sensitivity from women with ASBP so as to reduce the associated complications.

Indexed as

Prenatal CareAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacteriuriaDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultivariate AnalysisPregnancyPrevalenceUgandaYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID32191758
PMCPMC7082119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.