ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2020
Enhancing self-resources in patients with chronic diseases: development and initial validation of the Disease and Care Management Score.
Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite the importance of the assessment in the primary care of the self-resources among patients with chronic diseases, there is not available a measurement that allows this kind of comprehensive assessment. For this reason, the aim of this study was to develop a multi-dimensional score to determine the level of self-resources in chronic patients, describing its initial validation through face and content validity. The developed score was labelled as Disease and Care Management Score.
methodsWe performed a methodological study, encompassing two main phases. The first phase was aimed to develop the Disease and Care Management score, choosing the most suitable measurement to assess each pre-identified determinant of wellbeing in chronic patients. The second phase was aimed to determine the Disease and Care Management score face and content validity through the views of 20 experts.
resultsDisease and Care Management score shows evidence of face and content validity. All the obtained quantitative content validity indices (i.e. Content Validity Ratio, Content Validity Indices) were higher than 0,70, showing the pertinence and the adequacy of each pre-identified measure to compute Disease and Care Management score.
conclusionDisease and Care Management score has the potential of addressing the health coaching interventions in primary care for chronic patients. Future research should show its predictive performance, as well as the cut-off to discriminate patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.