Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32191493›Full record

Trial reportClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Comparison of Shear Stress-Induced Thrombotic and Thrombolytic Effects Among 3 Different Antithrombotic Regimens in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Minsuk Kim, Si-Hyuck Kang, Jeong-Ran Kim, Jin Joo Park, Young-Seok Cho, Tae-Jin Youn, In-Ho Chae, Jung-Won Suh

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Minsuk KimCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0968-8310
Si-Hyuck KangCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Ran KimCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Jin Joo ParkCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9611-1490
Young-Seok ChoCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Jin YounCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
In-Ho ChaeCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Won SuhCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shear stress (SS)-induced platelet activation is suggested as an essential mechanism of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aimed to compare SS-induced thrombotic and thrombolytic activities among 3 treatment regimens in patients with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients were nonrandomly enrolled and treated with one of 3 regimens (TICA: ticagrelor 180 mg/d; RIVA: clopidogrel 75 mg/d and rivaroxaban 5 mg/d; CLP: clopidogrel 75 mg/d), administered in addition to aspirin (100 mg/d) for 30 days. The global thrombosis test was applied to measure SS-induced thrombotic (occlusion time [OT]) and thrombolytic activity (lysis time [LT]) at day 2 and 30. Aspirin reaction unit (ARU) and P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) were simultaneously measured using VerifyNow. Group differences in the OT, LT, ARU, and PRU were evaluated. Seventy-five patients (25 patients in each group) finished 30 days of follow-up. Clinical and angiographic characteristics did not differ among the 3 groups, except ACS subtype and pre-PCI coronary flow. No major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in any group during follow-up. The OT and LT did not differ among the 3 groups at day 30 (OT: TICA, 447.2 ± 87.1 vs RIVA, 458.5 ± 70.3, vs CLP, 471.9 ± 90.7, LT: 1522.3 ± 426.5 vs 1734.6 ± 454.3 vs 1510.2 ± 593.9) despite significant differences in the PRU among the 3 groups. Shear stress-induced thrombotic and thrombolytic activities did not differ among the 3 investigated antithrombotic treatments.

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalAcute Coronary SyndromeAdultAgedDrug CombinationsFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsProspective StudiesDrug CombinationsFibrinolytic AgentsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsantiplateletclopidogrelrivaroxabanthrombosisticagrelor

Identifiers

PMID32191493
PMCPMC7289065
OpenAlexW3012071973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.