Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32191349›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2020

Inbreeding shapes the evolution of marine invertebrates.

Kevin C Olsen, Will H Ryan, Alice A Winn, Ellen T Kosman, Jose A Moscoso, Stacy A Krueger-Hadfield, Scott C Burgess, David B Carlon, Richard K Grosberg, Susan Kalisz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. PhytoKeys · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Macroevolutionary patterns in marine hermaphroditism.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kevin C OlsenDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304.
Will H RyanDepartment of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35294.
Alice A WinnDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304.
Ellen T KosmanDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304.
Jose A MoscosoDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, 11794.
Stacy A Krueger-HadfieldDepartment of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35294.ORCID 0000-0002-7324-7448
Scott C BurgessDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304.ORCID 0000-0002-0348-3453
David B CarlonThe Biology Department, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine, 04011.
Richard K GrosbergCoastal and Marine Sciences Institute, University of California Davis, Davis, California, 95616.
Susan KaliszDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996.
Don R LevitanDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304.ORCID 0000-0001-5318-3312

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inbreeding is a potent evolutionary force shaping the distribution of genetic variation within and among populations of plants and animals. Yet, our understanding of the forces shaping the expression and evolution of nonrandom mating in general, and inbreeding in particular, remains remarkably incomplete. Most research on plant mating systems focuses on self-fertilization and its consequences for automatic selection, inbreeding depression, purging, and reproductive assurance, whereas studies of animal mating systems have often assumed that inbreeding is rare, and that natural selection favors traits that promote outbreeding. Given that many sessile and sedentary marine invertebrates and marine macroalgae share key life history features with seed plants (e.g., low mobility, modular construction, and the release of gametes into the environment), their mating systems may be similar. Here, we show that published estimates of inbreeding coefficients (F

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionInbreedingLife History TraitsAnimal DistributionAnimalsAquatic OrganismsInvertebratesPlant DispersalSeaweedTracheophytaInbreedingmarine invertebratemating system

Identifiers

PMID32191349
PMCPMC7383701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.