Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32191332›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2020

European adult smokers' perceptions of the harmfulness of e-cigarettes relative to combustible cigarettes: cohort findings from the 2016 and 2018 EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys.

Shannon Gravely, Pete Driezen, Christina N Kyriakos, Mary E Thompson, James Balmford, Tibor Demjén, Esteve Fernández, Ute Mons, Yannis Tountas, Kinga Janik-Koncewicz and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Combustible tobacco age-of-sale laws: an opportunity?Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shannon GravelyUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Pete DriezenUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Christina N KyriakosEuropean Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention, Brussels, Belgium.
Mary E ThompsonUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
James BalmfordInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Tibor DemjénSmoking or Health Hungarian Foundation, Budapest, Hungary.
Esteve FernándezTobacco Control Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Ute MonsCancer Prevention Unit and WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Yannis TountasNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Kinga Janik-KoncewiczHealth Promotion Foundation, Warsaw, Poland.
Witold ZatońskiHealth Promotion Foundation, Warsaw, Poland.
Antigona C TroforUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Grigore T.Popa', Iasi, Romania.
Constantine I VardavasEuropean Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention, Brussels, Belgium.
Geoffrey T FongUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
EUREST-PLUS Consortium

Funding

CIHR FDN-148477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study presents perceptions of the harmfulness of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) relative to combustible cigarettes among smokers from six European Union (EU) countries, prior to the implementation of the EU Tobacco Products Directive (TPD), and 2 years post-TPD.

methodsData were drawn from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys, a cohort study of adult smokers (≥18 years) from Germany, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Spain. Data were collected in 2016 (pre-TPD: N = 6011) and 2018 (post-TPD: N = 6027). Weighted generalized estimating equations were used to estimate perceptions of the harmfulness of e-cigarettes compared to combustible cigarettes (less harmful, equally harmful, more harmful or 'don't know').

resultsIn 2016, among respondents who were aware of e-cigarettes (72.2%), 28.6% reported that they perceived e-cigarettes to be less harmful than cigarettes (range 22.0% in Spain to 34.1% in Hungary). In 2018, 72.2% of respondents were aware of e-cigarettes, of whom 28.4% reported perceiving that e-cigarettes are less harmful. The majority of respondents perceived e-cigarettes to be equally or more harmful than cigarettes in both 2016 (58.5%) and 2018 (61.8%, P > 0.05). Overall, there were no significant changes in the perceptions that e-cigarettes are less, equally or more harmful than cigarettes, but 'don't know' responses significantly decreased from 12.9% to 9.8% (P = 0.036). The only significant change within countries was a decrease in 'don't know' responses in Spain (19.3-9.4%, P = .001).

conclusionsThe majority of respondents in these six EU countries perceived e-cigarettes to be equally or more harmful than combustible cigarettes.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsAdultCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleGermanyGreeceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHungaryMalePolandRomania

Identifiers

PMID32191332
PMCPMC7526777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.