ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2020
Threshold Change in CEA as a Predictor of Non-Progression to First-Line Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Elevated CEA.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current opinions on CEA in the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer.Translational oncology · 2026Review
- EXONERATE-TRaCE: A Liquid Biopsy for Tracking Response to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Based Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Landscape of Diagnostic, Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: From Genomics to Multi-Omics Integration in Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Development of a Risk-Identification Model for Incidentally Detected Cancer in Patients with Diabetes: A Case-Control Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors in patients with colon cancer liver metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Peripheral Blood T-Cell Receptor Repertoire Diversity as a Potential Biomarker in the Diagnosis and Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal and Lung Cancers: A Prospective Observational Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Observational
- An SNP Marker Predicts Colorectal Cancer Outcomes with 5-Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy Post-Resection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Overview and countermeasures of cancer burden in China.Science China. Life sciences · 2023Review
- Reagentless Electrochemical Detection of Tumor Biomarker Based on Stable Confinement of Electrochemical Probe in Bipolar Silica Nanochannel Film.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- CEA dynamics for predicting response after anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Effectiveness and safety of capecitabine, irinotecan and panitumumab in advanced colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- TCR engineered T cells for solid tumor immunotherapy.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2022Review
- Clinical Trial Endpoints in Metastatic Cancer: Using Individual Participant Data to Inform Future Trials Methodology.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Review
- Dynamic monitoring of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 and inflammation-based indices in patients with advanced colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Association of serum Interleukin-8 level with lymph node metastasis and tumor recurrence in gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: A contemporary review of the literature.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Review
- Review
- Development and validation of MMR prediction model based on simplified clinicopathological features and serum tumour markers.EBioMedicine · 2020Article
- Simultaneous Detection of VEGF and CEA by Time-Resolved Chemiluminescence Enzyme-Linked Aptamer Assay.International journal of nanomedicine · 2020Article
- Predictive Biomarkers in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.JCO precision oncology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are used in conjunction with imaging to monitor response to systemic therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We sought to identify a threshold for CEA change from baseline to predict progressive disease (PD) in mCRC patients receiving first-line therapy.
methodsPatients from trials collected in the ARCAD database were included if baseline CEA was at least 10 ng/mL and repeat CEA was available within 14 days of first restaging scan. Optimal cutoffs for CEA change were identified by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Prediction performance of cutoffs was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value. Analyses were conducted by treatment class: chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody, and chemotherapy with anti-EGFR antibody.
resultsA total of 2643 mCRC patients treated with systemic therapy were included. Median percent change of CEA from baseline to first restaging for patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease (non-PD) and PD was -53.1% and +23.6% for chemotherapy alone (n = 957) and -71.7% and -45.3% for chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody (n = 1355). The optimal area under the curve cutoff for differentiating PD from non-PD on first restaging was -7.5% for chemotherapy alone and -62.0% for chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody; chemotherapy alone, adjusted odds ratio = 6.51 (95% CI = 3.31 to 12.83, P < .001), chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody, adjusted odds ratio = 3.45 (95% CI = 1.93 to 6.18, P < .001). A 99% negative predictive value clinical cutoff for prediction of non-PD would avoid CT scan at first restaging in 21.0% of chemotherapy alone and 16.2% of chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody-treated patients. Among patients with stable disease on first restaging, those with decreased CEA from baseline had statistically significantly improved progression-free and overall survival.
conclusionsChange in CEA from baseline to first restaging can accurately predict non-progression and correlates with long-term outcomes in patients receiving systemic chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.