Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32191301›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2020

Volunteer engagement to inform research on cardiovascular health awareness, Canada.

Marie-Thérèse Lussier, Janusz Kaczorowski, Magali Girard, Emmanuelle Arpin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marie-Thérèse LussierÉquipe de recherche en soins de première ligne, Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Laval, Laval, Canada.
Janusz KaczorowskiDépartement de Médecine de Famille et de Médecine d'Urgence, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Magali GirardCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Emmanuelle ArpinInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CACentre Integre de Sante et de Services Sociaux de Laval · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volunteers have been extensively used in health promotion programmes. However, they have been less frequently involved in the research process. In its most recent iterations, the Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP) integrated volunteers (i) to facilitate CHAP sessions with participating patients for data collection and (ii) to evaluate the intervention. Drawing on the patient and public involvement literature, our research team included volunteers in the data collection and evaluation of CHAP sessions as part of the programme's implementation in the province of Quebec (Canada). We sought volunteers' formal feedback through individual online and phone interviews and through focus groups for each of the four projects conducted in Quebec. We found that volunteers provide valuable insight on the research protocol as well as patient needs. Their feedback led to several modifications to the research protocol and procedures of subsequent CHAP sessions. Changes included involving volunteers at earlier stages of the research process, adding more learning modules and practice sessions during the volunteer training and defining research priorities according to patient needs. Our methodology of engaging volunteers in the research process was useful to gain important and unique insight on patient needs and for future programme planning to modify the research process.

Indexed as

Health PromotionVolunteersCanadaHumansProgram EvaluationQuebeccardiovascular diseasecommunity-based participatory researchhealth knowledge promotionprimary carevolunteers

Identifiers

PMID32191301
PMCPMC7785306
OpenAlexW3011822120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.