ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Addition of CORES to the I-PASS Handoff: A Resident-led Quality Improvement Study.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Communication in the Medical Intensive Care Unit Through Standardization of Handoff Format: A Quality Improvement Project.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2023Article
- Implementation of a standardized handoff system (I-PASS) in a tertiary care pediatric hospital.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2023Article
- Standardizing Sign-out With I-PASS Handoff in Family Medicine Residency.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2021Article
- Introduction of the EMR-integrated I-PASS ICU Handoff Tool.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Response to "Introduction of the EMR-integrated I-PASS ICU Handoff Tool".Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality patient handoff is vital in patient care and attainable with structured handoff systems, such as the I-PASS mnemonic. This paper describes a continuous quality improvement study occurring after the implementation of the I-PASS handoff bundle. Our objectives were to (1) determine compliance with the inclusion of I-PASS elements during handoff and (2) determine whether the addition of CORES, an electronic tool that generates a patient list designed for use with I-PASS, would improve compliance and sustainability.
methodsWe developed an aim statement: 90% of handoffs would include all 6 I-PASS elements within 6 months of the addition of CORES. Two plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were conducted. In PDSA 1, we implemented CORES. In PDSA 2, we reeducated residents on I-PASS elements and the importance of a quality handoff. We used a checklist to evaluate the inclusion of I-PASS elements. Following PDSA 2, we administered a survey regarding CORES to involved residents.
resultsDuring PDSA 1, illness severity, diagnosis, patient summary, contingency planning, action list, and receiver synthesis were present in 13%, 62%, 52%, 87%, 42%, and 25% of handoffs, respectively. Overall compliance was 47%. During PDSA 2, illness severity remained stable at 13% whereas the remainder increased to 84%, 82%, 93%, 91%, and 37%. Overall compliance increased to 67%. Following PDSA 2, 100% of survey respondents reported improved handoff with CORES.
conclusionsIn this study, we show that neither implementation of CORES nor resident reeducation resulted in the return to high postintervention compliance observed after implementation of the I-PASS handoff bundle.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.