Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32190794›Full record

ArticlePediatric quality & safety

Implementation of Targeted Point of Care HIV Testing in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

Seema R Bhatt, Michelle D Eckerle, Jennifer L Reed, Venita Robinson, Angela Brown, Joyce Lippe, Carolyn Holland, Srikant Iyer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Unique Needs for the Implementation of Emergency Department Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening in Adolescents.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seema R BhattDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Michelle D EckerleDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Jennifer L ReedDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Venita RobinsonDivision of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Angela BrownDivision of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Joyce LippeKaiser Permanente, Roseville, Calif.
Carolyn HollandDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Fla.
Srikant IyerDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USGTx (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV infection rates are increasing among adolescents. Despite guidelines recommending annual HIV screening among sexually active adolescents, 3.6% of adolescents tested for other sexually transmitted infections (STI) in a pediatric emergency department (PED) were screened for HIV. The aim was to increase HIV screening to 90%.

methodsInterventions were designed to address 4 key drivers thought to be critical in reliably offering HIV testing. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of adolescents offered HIV testing among those being tested for common STIs. Statistical process control charts were used to measure performance over time and differentiate common versus special cause variation.

resultsWe instituted point of care (POC) HIV testing in the PED in January 2012. The proportion of STI tested patients offered HIV testing was increased to >87% and sustained this performance. Implementation of a clinical decision support tool had the highest impact. The majority offered testing agreed, and the most common reason for refusal was a recent negative test. We identified eleven HIV positive patients over 5 years. Eight were newly diagnosed, and 3 had prior positive tests but were not connected to care. All 11 were successfully connected to providers with HIV care expertise.

conclusionsPOC HIV testing is feasible, acceptable, and sustainable in a PED setting. The implementation of targeted HIV POC testing in the PED increased the number of HIV tests being offered, the number of high-risk patients being screened, and the number diagnosed and connected to care.

Identifiers

PMID32190794
PMCPMC7056291
OpenAlexW2998753981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.