Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32190779›Full record

ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2020

Enhanced recovery after surgery for gastric cancer (ERAS-GC): optimizing patient outcome.

Jacopo Desiderio, Stefano Trastulli, Vito D'Andrea, Amilcare Parisi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Role of surgery in metastatic gastric cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. 3D laparoscopic-assistedWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacopo DesiderioDepartment of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Terni, Italy.
Stefano TrastulliDepartment of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Terni, Italy.
Vito D'AndreaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Amilcare ParisiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Terni, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant advances were achieved, in last decades, in the management of surgical patients with gastric cancer. This has led to the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) with the objective of reducing the length of hospital stay, accelerating postoperative recovery and reducing the surgical stress. The ERAS protocols have many items, including the pre-operative patient education, early mobilization and feeding starting from the first postoperative day. This review aims to highlight possible advantages on postoperative functional recovery outcomes after gastrectomy in patients undergoing an ERAS program, current lack of evidences and future perspectives.

Indexed as

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)gastrectomygastric cancer

Identifiers

PMID32190779
PMCPMC7061180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.