Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32190758›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2020

The recent use of

Sukardiman, Martha Ervina

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. UPLC-ESI/MSFrontiers in chemistry · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

SukardimanDepartment of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
Martha ErvinaDoctoral Program of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
Airlangga University · IDUniversitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural resources provide more efficient and safer alternatives in managing diabetes compare to the synthetic oral anti diabetes (OAD). The plants not only have hypoglycemic effect, but also prevent its complications; in which no synthetic drugs provide of both properties. Among antidiabetes plants, mahogany seed (

methodsThe present study was performed of chemotaxonomic approach to review its phytochemical and anti-diabetic properties of

results

conclusion

Indexed as

DiabetesHypoglycemicMahoganyMeliaceaeSwietenia spToxicology

Identifiers

PMID32190758
PMCPMC7068623
OpenAlexW3011665933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.