Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32190740›Full record

ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2020

Differentiation of Pontine Infarction by Size.

Lei Yang, Wei Qin, Yue Li, Shuna Yang, Hua Gu, Wenli Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lei YangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8, South Gongti Road, Beijing 100020, China.
Wei QinDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8, South Gongti Road, Beijing 100020, China.
Yue LiDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8, South Gongti Road, Beijing 100020, China.
Shuna YangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8, South Gongti Road, Beijing 100020, China.
Hua GuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing China.
Wenli HuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8, South Gongti Road, Beijing 100020, China.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Chao-Yang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe hypothesized that the current criteria may be unsuitable for lacunar pontine infarctions (LPI) diagnosis and that size criteria may indicate different stroke mechanisms.

methodsA total of 102 patients with isolated pontine infarctions were divided into a parent artery disease (PAD) and non-PAD groups according to stenosis of basilar artery. Further, 86 patients from the non-PAD group were divided into paramedian pontine infarction (PPI) and LPI groups. Data were collected from the three groups. The "golden" criterion for LPI was established based on the location of the infarction. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the optimal cutoff value to use as an LPI diagnostic indicator.

resultsThere was a high prevalence of patients with PAD in both asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis (ACAS) and PPI groups. Patients with PPI had a higher prevalence in diabetes and ACAS than those with LPI. Based upon the ROC curve, the optimal lesion size cutoff value for use as an LPI diagnostic indicator was 11.8 mm.

conclusionsDiffusion weighted imaging (DWI) cutoff points for predicting LPI may differ from that of the middle cerebral artery territory. The diameter of LPI may also indicate different stroke mechanisms.

Indexed as

Branch diseasDiagnosisLacunar infarctionPontine infarction

Identifiers

PMID32190740
PMCPMC7065441
OpenAlexW3012259099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.