Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32190727›Full record

ArticleJournal of archaeological science, reports2020

Birch bark tar in early Medieval England - Continuity of tradition or technological revival?

Rebecca J Stacey, Julie Dunne, Sue Brunning, Thibaut Devièse, Richard Mortimer, Stuart Ladd, Keith Parfitt, Richard Evershed, Ian Bull

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of archaeological science, reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca J StaceyDepartment of Scientific Research, British Museum, Great Russell Street, London WC1B 3DG, UK.
Julie DunneOrganic Geochemistry Unit, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK.
Sue BrunningDepartment of Britain, Europe and Prehistory, British Museum, Great Russell Street, London WC1B 3DG, UK.
Thibaut DevièseDepartment of Scientific Research, British Museum, Great Russell Street, London WC1B 3DG, UK.
Richard MortimerOxford Archaeology East, 15 Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridgeshire, CB23 8SQ, UK.
Stuart LaddOxford Archaeology East, 15 Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridgeshire, CB23 8SQ, UK.
Keith ParfittCanterbury Archaeological Trust Ltd, 92A Broad Street, Canterbury, Kent CT1 2LU, UK.
Richard EvershedOrganic Geochemistry Unit, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK.
Ian BullOrganic Geochemistry Unit, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK.
British Museum · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBOxford Archaeology · GBCanterbury Archaeological Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birch bark tar is a manufactured product with a history of production and use that reaches back to the Palaeolithic. Its sticky, water resistant and biocidal properties mean that it has a wide range of applications, for example, as a multipurpose adhesive, sealant and in medicine. Archaeological evidence for birch bark tar in the old world covers a broad geographic range from the UK to the Baltic and from the Mediterranean to Scandinavia. In the east and north of this range there is continuity of use to modern times but in western Europe and the British Isles the use of birch bark tar has generally been viewed as limited to prehistory, with gradual displacement by pine tars during the Roman period. Here, we report new finds of birch bark tar from two early Medieval sites in the east of England. Analysis by HT-GC/MS to identify the tars also revealed fatty material, possibly added to modify the tar. The different contexts of the finds point to diverse applications of the material: in one case perhaps a medicine, the other associated with a ceramic container, possibly used for processing the tar. The results present the first identification of birch bark tar from early Medieval archaeological contexts in the UK. Together they indicate a later period of use for birch bark tar in the UK than has been previously observed and raise the question of whether this indicates evidence of a longer continuity of use than hitherto recognised or a later reintroduction of the technology in the Medieval period, in which case the similarities between the find sites, both early Anglo-Saxon cemeteries with comparable assemblages of grave goods, may be significant.

Indexed as

BetulinBirch bark tarEarly MedievalHT-GC/MSLipids

Identifiers

PMID32190727
PMCPMC7063695
OpenAlexW2995961112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.