Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32190641›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of genomics2020

Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Molecular Defensive Mechanism of

Hao Zhang, Xiaobo Zhao, Quanxi Sun, Caixia Yan, Juan Wang, Cuiling Yuan, Chunjuan Li, Shihua Shan, Fengzhen Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Identification ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome-Wide Analysis of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Genome-Wide Identification of PeanutPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hsf transcription factor gene family in peanut (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  18. The genusFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hao ZhangState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology and College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3362-8489
Xiaobo ZhaoShandong Peanut Research Institute, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China.
Quanxi SunShandong Peanut Research Institute, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China.
Caixia YanShandong Peanut Research Institute, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China.
Juan WangShandong Peanut Research Institute, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China.
Cuiling YuanShandong Peanut Research Institute, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China.
Chunjuan LiShandong Peanut Research Institute, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China.
Shihua ShanShandong Peanut Research Institute, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-4194
Fengzhen LiuState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology and College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0537-8788
Shandong Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abiotic stresses comprise all nonliving factors, such as soil salinity, drought, extreme temperatures, and metal toxicity, posing a serious threat to agriculture and affecting the plant production around the world. Peanut (

Identifiers

PMID32190641
PMCPMC7063224
OpenAlexW3006911341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.