Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32190566›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2020

Development and assessment of an individualized nomogram to predict colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Mingyang Li, Xueyan Li, Yu Guo, Zheng Miao, Xiaoming Liu, Shuxu Guo, Huimao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mingyang LiState Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Xueyan LiState Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Yu GuoDepartment of Radiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
Zheng MiaoState Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Xiaoming LiuState Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Shuxu GuoState Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Huimao ZhangDepartment of Radiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis article aims to develop and assess the radiomics paradigm for predicting colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) from the primary tumor.

methodsThis retrospective study included 100 patients from the First Hospital of Jilin University from June 2017 to December 2017. The 100 patients comprised 50 patients with and 50 without CRLM. The maximum-level enhanced computed tomography (CT) image of primary cancer in the portal venous phase of each patient was selected as the original image data. To automatically implement radiomics-related paradigms, we developed a toolkit called Radiomics Intelligent Analysis Toolkit (RIAT).

resultsWith RIAT, the model based on logistic regression (LR) using both the radiomics and clinical information signatures showed the maximum net benefit. The area under the curve (AUC) value was 0.90±0.02 (sensitivity =0.85±0.02, specificity =0.79±0.04) for the training set, 0.86±0.11 (sensitivity =0.85±0.09, specificity =0.75±0.19) for the verification set, 0.906 (95% CI, 0.840-0.971; sensitivity =0.81, specificity =0.84) for the cross-validation set, and 0.899 (95% CI, 0.761-1.000; sensitivity =0.78, specificity =0.91) for the test set.

conclusionsThe radiomics nomogram-based LR with clinical risk and radiomics features allows for a more accurate classification of CRLM using CT images with RIAT.

Indexed as

colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM)machine learningnomogramRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID32190566
PMCPMC7063284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.