ReviewWorld journal of orthopedics2020
Revision total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of the quality and readability of information on the internet.
Review in World journal of orthopedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Best practices on patient education materials in hip surgery based on learnings from major hip centers and societies.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2024Article
- Online resources for information on shoulder arthroplasty: an assessment of quality and readability.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2023Article
- Digital health information on surgical treatment options for overactive bladder is underrepresented.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the quality of information online for arthroscopic Bankart repair.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2023Review
- Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Quality and Content of Internet-Based Information for Osteoporosis and Fragility Fracture Diagnoses.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021Article
- Osseointegration in Limb Replacement Surgery: A Quality and Readability Analysis of Information on the Internet.Strategies in trauma and limb reconstructionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The demand for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing. Information quality on the internet has been extensively analysed in relation to primary THA but no such analysis has ever been performed for revision THA. Our aim was to assess the quality and readability of this information. Three major internet search engines were searched for information on revision THA. All websites were assessed for quality of information using the DISCERN score, the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria and a novel scoring system specific to revision THA [Vancouver Revision Arthroplasty Information (VRAI) score]. Website readability was assessed, as was presence of the Health On the Net Foundation (HON) seal. The majority of websites (52%) were academic with a post-graduate reading level. Only 6.5% of websites had the HON seal. Twenty-eight percent of websites had a 'good' DISCERN score and only 28% had a 'good' score with the novel VRAI scoring system. Health information websites had significantly higher rates of 'good' VRAI scores (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.