ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2020
Video research visits for atypical parkinsonian syndromes among Fox Trial Finder participants.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of methods used to conduct decentralised clinical trials.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Research on the perspectives of people affected by dementia with Lewy bodies: a scoping review.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Neurological Examination via Telemedicine: An Updated Review Focusing on Movement Disorders.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Best Practices and Recommendations for Research Using Virtual Real-Time Data Collection: Protocol for Virtual Data Collection Studies.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Telemedicine in the Management of Parkinson's Disease: Achievements, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- A Remote Longitudinal Observational Study of Individuals at Genetic Risk for Parkinson Disease: Baseline Results.Neurology. Genetics · 2022Article
- Patients' Postjudice of Tele-Neurology for Movement Disorders.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2022Article
- Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Parkinson's Disease: a Single-Centered Qualitative Study.The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques · 2022Article
- The state of telemedicine for persons with Parkinson's disease.Current opinion in neurology · 2021Review
- Practicing in a Pandemic: A Clinician's Guide to Remote Neurologic Care.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2021Article
- Design of a virtual longitudinal observational study in Parkinson's disease (AT-HOME PD).Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2021Observational
- Palliative Care in Movement Disorders: an Evolving Field.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021Review
- Challenges and opportunities for improving the landscape for Lewy body dementia clinical trials.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2020Review
- Telemedicine: A valuable tool in neurodegenerative diseases.Current geriatrics reports · 2020Article
- Remote Administration of the MDS-UPDRS in the Time of COVID-19 and Beyond.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUse of video research visits in neurologic conditions is rising, but their utility has not been assessed in atypical parkinsonian syndromes. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic concordance between video-based vs self-reported diagnoses of multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, dementia with Lewy bodies, and corticobasal syndrome. We also assessed patient satisfaction with video-based visits.
methodsWe conducted a study of video-based research visits in individuals with an atypical parkinsonian syndrome enrolled in The Michael J. Fox Foundation's Fox Trial Finder. Participants completed a recorded real-time video visit with a remote evaluator who was blinded to the participant's self-reported diagnosis. The investigator conducted a structured interview and performed standard assessments of motor function. Following the visit, the investigator selected the most likely diagnosis. The recorded visit was reviewed by a second blinded investigator who also selected the most likely diagnosis. We evaluated diagnostic concordance between the 2 independent investigators and assessed concordance between investigator consensus diagnosis and self-reported diagnosis using Cohen's kappa. We assessed participant satisfaction with a survey.
resultsWe enrolled 45 individuals with atypical parkinsonian syndromes, and 44 completed the investigator-performed video assessment. We demonstrated excellent concordance in diagnosis between the investigators (κ = 0.83) and good reliability of self-reported diagnosis (κ = 0.73). More than 90% of participants were satisfied or very satisfied with the convenience, comfort, and overall visit.
conclusionsVideo research visits are feasible and reliable in those with an atypical parkinsonian syndrome. These visits represent a promising option for reducing burden and extending the reach of clinical research to individuals with these rare and disabling conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.