Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32190246›Full record

ArticleChemical science2019

DeltaDelta neural networks for lead optimization of small molecule potency.

José Jiménez-Luna, Laura Pérez-Benito, Gerard Martínez-Rosell, Simone Sciabola, Rubben Torella, Gary Tresadern, Gianni De Fabritiis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Directional ΔJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. ImprovingJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

José Jiménez-LunaComputational Science Laboratory , Parc de Recerca Biomèdica de Barcelona , Universitat Pompeu Fabra , C Dr Aiguader 88 , Barcelona , 08003 , Spain . Email: gianni.defabritiis@upf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5335-7834
Laura Pérez-BenitoLaboratori de Medicina Computacional , Unitat de Bioestadística , Facultat de Medicina , Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona , Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9607-9048
Gerard Martínez-RosellAcellera , Carrer del Dr Trueta, 183 , 08005 Barcelona , Spain.
Simone SciabolaBiogen Chemistry and Molecular Therapeutics , 115 Broadway Street , Cambridge , MA 02142 , USA.
Rubben TorellaPfizer I&I , 610 Main Street , Cambridge , MA 02139 , USA.
Gary TresadernJanssen Research and Development , Turnhoutseweg 30 , 2340 Beerse , Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4801-1644
Gianni De FabritiisComputational Science Laboratory , Parc de Recerca Biomèdica de Barcelona , Universitat Pompeu Fabra , C Dr Aiguader 88 , Barcelona , 08003 , Spain . Email: gianni.defabritiis@upf.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3913-4877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capability to rank different potential drug molecules against a protein target for potency has always been a fundamental challenge in computational chemistry due to its importance in drug design. While several simulation-based methodologies exist, they are hard to use prospectively and thus predicting potency in lead optimization campaigns remains an open challenge. Here we present the first machine learning approach specifically tailored for ranking congeneric series based on deep 3D-convolutional neural networks. Furthermore we prove its effectiveness by blindly testing it on datasets provided by Janssen, Pfizer and Biogen totalling over 3246 ligands and 13 targets as well as several well-known openly available sets, representing one the largest evaluations ever performed. We also performed online learning simulations of lead optimization using the approach in a predictive manner obtaining significant advantage over experimental choice. We believe that the evaluation performed in this study is strong evidence of the usefulness of a modern deep learning model in lead optimization pipelines against more expensive simulation-based alternatives.

Identifiers

PMID32190246
PMCPMC7066671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.