ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2020
Homogeneous Group approach to Elixhauser comorbidity for hospital death using administrative data.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Influenza as an important factor causing increased risk of patients' deaths, excessive morbidity and prolonged hospital stays.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2023Article
- The Association between Diabetes Mellitus and Keratoplasty in Poland in the Years 2013-2017.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe purpose of this study was to introduce a measure of patient's burden based on Elixhauser's comorbidity index. The mentioned measure needed to be based solely on administrative data and be applicable to all specialisations of hospital treatment. Moreover, the intention was to validate the estimation power of the models based on the groups of hospitalisations which were similar with respect to the primary diagnosis. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn the study, we considered all hospitalisations in Poland from 2014 and 2015. Overall, 22 045 267 hospitalisation records of 11 566 525 patients were retrieved. An important element of this research was to validate the estimation power of the models based on the groups of patients who were similar with respect to the main reason for hospitalisation. Therefore, the population was split into 21 Homogeneous Groups based on the changed primary diagnosis. As explanatory variables we used demographic variables and 31 comorbidities defined by Elixhauser. The outcome variable was patient's mortality - in-hospital or up to 365 days after discharge.
resultsOut of the 21 created models, 9 had a very good estimation power (C-statistic over 0.85), the other 9 had satysfying results (C-statistic between 0.75 and 0.85) and only 3 performed poorly (C-statistic below 0.75). The odds ratio of variables varied widely between the groups.
conclusionsOur results support the hypothesis that comorbidity properly describes mortality in homogeneous groups of patients. Our models could be condensed into one, uniform, single-number comorbidity scale that summarizes all of the patient's burden. It was found that the odds ratio of some variables differed between homogeneous groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.