ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2020
Cost-effectiveness of the hospital nutrition screening tool CIPA.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06031766 (Comparison of CIPA With the GLIM Criteria of Malnutrition and Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Inpatients), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of CIPA With the GLIM Criteria of Malnutrition and Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Inpatients
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progress in caring for cancer patients in the scope of quality of life assessment.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Comparison of the efficacy of vindesine and leurocristine for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia and their effects on quality of life.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of the CIPA nutritional screening tool in over 30,000 hospitalized patients: a retrospective study (2014-2022).Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- The effect of therapeutic exercise in the prevention of lymphoedema secondary to breast cancer: a systematic review.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2023Review
- The possible role of machine learning in detection of increased cardiovascular risk patients - KSC MR Study (design).Archives of medical science : AMS · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the activity and medical nutrition therapy types used by nutrition support teams in hospitals in the Greater Poland voivodeship.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2021Article
- Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Surgical Patients Subjected to CIPA Nutrition Screening and Treatment versus Standard Care.Nutrients · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHospital malnutrition is very common and worsens the clinical course of patients while increasing costs. Lacking clinical-economic studies on the implementation of nutrition screening encouraged the evaluation of the CIPA (Control of Food Intake, Protein, Anthropometry) tool. MATERIAL AND
methodsAn open, non-randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted on patients admitted to internal medicine and general and digestive surgery wards, who were either assigned to a control (standard hospital clinical care) or to an intervention, CIPA-performing ward (412 and 411, respectively;
resultsThe mean length of stay was higher in the CIPA group, though not significantly (+ 0.95 days;
conclusionsThe CIPA nutrition screening tool is likely to be cost-effective in surgical but not in internal medicine patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.