ArticleMycoKeys2020
Article in MycoKeys, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morphology and multigene phylogeny reveal five new species and two new records of saprobic microfungi from Yunnan, China.MycoKeys · 2026Article
- An updated multigene phylogeny ofPersoonia · 2025Article
- Four new species ofMycoKeys · 2025Article
- Growth-Promoting Effects of Grass Root-Derived FungiMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Cadophora species from marine glaciers in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: an example of unsuspected hidden biodiversity.IMA fungus · 2022Article
- Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 4.Studies in mycology · 2022Article
- Fungal species associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Washington wine grapes and California table grapes, with novelties in the generaFrontiers in fungal biology · 2022Article
- Draft Genome Sequences of TwoMicrobiology resource announcements · 2021Article
- Fungal Planet description sheets: 1182-1283.Persoonia · 2021Article
- New species ofFungal systematics and evolution · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During a survey on fungi associated with wood necroses of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.