ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Comparison of bony increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty and standard reverse shoulder arthroplasty outcomes.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative glenoid reconstruction strategies in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of standard reconstruction, bony increased offset, and metal-augmented increased offset techniques.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Pooled it
- Bony increased offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) vs metal augments: A systematic review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Humeral and glenoid lateralization based on glenoid-humeral axis interval results in functional improvements following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.JSES international · 2026Article
- Lateralising reverse shoulder arthroplasty using bony increased offset (BIO-RSA) or increasing glenoid component diameter: comparison of clinical, radiographic and patient reported outcomes in a matched cohort.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2024Article
- Restoration of External Rotation by Sequential Glenoid Lateralization Based on Body Size in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate functional outcomes and complications between the standard RSA and BIO-RSA. 65 consecutive procedures were performed in 60 patients (40 BIO-RSA and 25 RSA). There was no statistically significant difference in functional outcome, pain and complications. The BIO-RSA can produce comparable, if not better functional results than a standard RSA whilst reducing the rates of scapula notching, prosthesis instability, lost shoulder rotation and poor shoulder contour. It should therefore be considered in all patients presenting with cuff tear arthropathy, massive rotator cuff tear and fracture sequelae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.