Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32189825›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2018

SLIC robust (SLICR) processing for fast, robust CT myocardial blood flow quantification.

Hao Wu, Brendan L Eck, Jacob Levi, Anas Fares, Yuemeng Li, Di Wen, Hiram G Bezerra, David L Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hao WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Brendan L EckDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Jacob LeviDepartment of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Anas FaresCardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratory, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Yuemeng LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Di WenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Hiram G BezerraCardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratory, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
David L WilsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity Hospitals Case Medical Center · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Biomedical Imaging Training ProgramT32EB007509 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID Lynn WILSON, Xin Yu · 2007 to 2026
$5.6M
System-independent quantitative cardiac CT perfusionR41HL144271 · NHLBI · BIOINVISION, INC. · PI WILSON, DAVID LYNN · 2018 to 2018
$224k
NHLBI NIH HHS R41 HL144271NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are several computational methods for estimating myocardial blood flow (MBF) using CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI). Previous work has shown that model-based deconvolution methods are more accurate and precise than model-independent methods such as singular value decomposition and max-upslope. However, iterative optimization is computationally expensive and models are sensitive to image noise, thus limiting the utility of low x-ray dose acquisitions. We propose a new processing method, SLICR, which segments the myocardium into super-voxels using a modified simple linear iterative clustering (SLIC) algorithm and quantifies MBF via a robust physiologic model (RPM). We compared SLICR against voxel-wise SVD and voxel-wise model-based deconvolution methods (RPM, single-compartment and Johnson-Wilson). We used image data from a digital CT-MPI phantom to evaluate robustness of processing methods to noise at reduced x-ray dose. We validate SLICR in a porcine model with and without partial occlusion of the LAD coronary artery with known pressure-wire fractional flow reserve. SLICR was ~50 times faster than voxel-wise RPM and other model-based methods while retaining sufficient resolution to show all clinically interesting features (e.g., a flow deficit in the endocardial wall). SLICR showed much better precision and accuracy than the other methods. For example, at simulated MBF=100 mL/min/100g and 100 mAs exposure (50% of nominal dose) in the digital simulator, MBF estimates were 101 ± 12 mL/min/100g, 160 ± 54 mL/min/100g, and 122 ± 99 mL/min/100g for SLICR, SVD, and Johnson-Wilson, respectively. SLICR even gave excellent results (103 ± 23 ml/min/100g) at 50 mAs, corresponding to 25% nominal dose.

Indexed as

dose reductionDynamic CT perfusionmyocardial blood flowsuper-voxel

Identifiers

PMID32189825
PMCPMC7079729
OpenAlexW2792926836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.