Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32189715›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

A Modified Suture Technique in Hepaticojejunostomy.

Guangbing Li, Li Yuan, Guangsheng Yu, Yantian Xu, Jun Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guangbing LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Li YuanDepartment of Anesthesia, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Guangsheng YuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Yantian XuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Jun LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Shandong Provincial Hospital · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Hepaticojejunostomy is a common biliary reconstruction procedure in hepatobiliary surgery. The suture technique plays a key role in the procedure. The conventional suture technique is complex and time-consuming. To facilitate the procedure, we performed it with a modified suture technique. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the technique in hepaticojejunostomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 120 adult patients who underwent hepaticojejunostomy. The patients were divided into a conventional group and a modified suture group according to the suture technique used. Clinical data were collected for analysis. RESULTS No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of demographic data. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of serum bilirubin, albumin, AST, ALT, or hemoglobin (p>0.05). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of bile hemorrhage, fever, or cholangitis (p>0.05). The incidences of stenosis and cholelithiasis were similar in the 2 groups (p>0.05). The incidence of bile leakage was lower in the modified suture group than in the conventional group (p=0.04). The average bile duct diameter was 25±6 mm in the modified continuous suture group and 29±7mm in the conventional group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.5). The duration of the anastomosis procedure was 15.4±4.4 min in the modified continuous suture group, which was shorter than in the conventional group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The modified continuous suture technique is efficient and safe for use in hepaticojejunostomy. It can facilitate the procedure and reduce the incidence of bile leakage after hepaticojejunostomy.

Indexed as

JejunostomySuture TechniquesAdultAnastomosis, SurgicalBile DuctsBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID32189715
PMCPMC12574464
OpenAlexW3001622442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.