ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2020
Citation Classics on Dental Caries: A Systematic Review.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Salivary elemental signature of dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ionomics studies.Odontology · 2024Pooled it
- Bibliometric Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies on Early Childhood Caries.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessment of Correlation between Genetic Taste Perception Hormonal Fingerprint and Dental Caries Incidence in Schoolgoing Children: AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024Article
- CHN nanocomposites and nanocoating resist enamel white spot lesions by enhancing remineralization and antibacterial activity.RSC advances · 2024Article
- A bibliometric and subject analysis of 3300 most-cited articles in dentistry.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2022Article
- Systemic Manifestations of the Periodontal Disease: A Bibliometric Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Antibiotics: A Bibliometric Analysis of Top 100 Classics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Applications of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Dentistry: A Bibliometric Analysis.BioMed research international · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA systematic search was performed for the identification and analysis of the 100 most often cited articles on dental caries and to highlight the changing trends in the field of dentistry over time. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe search was performed without any restriction on the study design, publication year, or language using the Web of Science (WoS) group of Clarivate Analytics enabling the search through "All Databases." Based on the citation count as available in WoS, the articles were sorted in a descending manner. Information regarding each article was then extracted, which included its authorship, counts of citation (in other databases), citation density, current citation index (2019), publication year, country of publication, journal of article, evidence level based on study design, and keywords description.
resultsThe count of citation for each article varied in each database, that is, 175 to 2,003 in WoS, 89 to 1,981 in Scopus, and 126 to 3,492 when searched in Google Scholar. The highest number of articles (
conclusionThe results of this systematic review provide a critical appraisal of the context underpinning scientific developments in the field of dental caries and also highlighted trends in clinical management and research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.