Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32189123›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

What level of symptoms are patients with adult spinal deformity prepared to live with? A cross-sectional analysis of the 12-month follow-up data from 1043 patients.

A F Mannion, M Loibl, J Bago, A Vila-Casademunt, S Richner-Wunderlin, T F Fekete, D Haschtmann, D Jeszenszky, F Pellisé, A Alanay and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Values derived from patient reported outcomes in spine surgery: a systematic review of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Is scoliosis a source of pain?Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2023
    Review
  9. Health-related quality of life of adult, non-surgically treated patients with idiopathic scoliosis and curves above 45°: a cross-sectional study at an average follow-up of 30 years.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Sagittal realignment: surgical restoration of the global alignment and proportion score parameters: a subgroup analysis. What are the consequences of failing to realign?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How back pain intensity relates to clinical and psychosocial factors in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

A F MannionDepartment of Teaching, Research and Development, Spine Center Division, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. anne.mannion@yahoo.com.
M LoiblSpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
J BagoSpine Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall Hebron, Passeig Vall Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
A Vila-CasademuntSpine Research Unit, Spine Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Passeig Vall Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
S Richner-WunderlinDepartment of Teaching, Research and Development, Spine Center Division, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
T F FeketeSpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
D HaschtmannSpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
D JeszenszkySpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
F PelliséSpine Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall Hebron, Passeig Vall Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
A AlanayDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Büyükdere cad, 40 Maslak, 344457, Istanbul, Turkey.
I ObeidPellegrin Bordeaux University Hospital, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
F S Pérez-GruesoHospital Universitario, La Paz Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
F S KleinstückSpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
European Spine Study Group (ESSG)
Schulthess-Klinik · CHAcıbadem University · TRHospital Universitario La Paz · ESVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrevious studies suggest that a meaningful and easily understood measure of treatment outcome may be the proportion of patients who are in a "patient acceptable symptom state" (PASS). We sought to quantify the score equivalent to PASS for different outcome instruments, in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).

methodsWe analysed the following 12-month questionnaire data from the European Spine Study Group (ESSG): Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; 0-100); Numeric Rating Scales (NRS; 0-10) for back/leg pain; Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) questionnaire; and an item "if you had to spend the rest of your life with the symptoms you have now, how would you feel about it?" (5-point scale, dichotomised with top 2 responses "somewhat satisfied/very satisfied" being considered PASS+, everything else PASS-). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses indicated the cut-off scores equivalent to PASS+.

resultsOut of 1043 patients (599 operative, 444 non-operative; 51 ± 19 years; 84% women), 42% reported being PASS+ at 12 months' follow-up. The ROC areas under the curve were 0.71-0.84 (highest for SRS subscore), suggesting the questionnaire scores discriminated well between PASS+ and PASS-. The scores corresponding to PASS+ were > 3.5 for the SRS subscore (> 3.3-3.8 for SRS subdomains); ≤ 18 for ODI; and ≤ 3 for NRS pain. There were slight differences in cut-offs for subgroups of age, treatment type, aetiology, baseline symptoms, and sex.

conclusionMost interventions for ASD improve patients' complaints but do not totally eliminate them. Reporting the percentage achieving a score equivalent to an "acceptable state" may represent a more stringent and discerning target for denoting treatment success in ASD. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationScoliosisAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAdult spinal deformityOswestry Disability IndexPain Numeric Rating ScalePatient acceptable symptom stateScoliosis Research Society (SRS) instrument

Identifiers

PMID32189123
OpenAlexW3012479677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.