Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32189094›Full record

Trial reportAdministration and policy in mental health2020

Delegating Clozapine Monitoring to Advanced Nurse Practitioners: An Exploratory, Randomized Study to Assess the Effect on Prescription and Its Safety.

Y C van der Zalm, P F Schulte, J P A M Bogers, F Termorshuizen, M Marcelis, M A G B van Piere, I E Sommer, J P Selten, CLOZ-NP Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Administration and policy in mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Y C van der ZalmRivierduinen Institute for Mental Health, Leiden, The Netherlands. y.vanderzalm@rivierduinen.nl.
P F SchulteDutch Clozapine Collaboration Group, Castricum, The Netherlands.
J P A M BogersRivierduinen Institute for Mental Health, Leiden, The Netherlands.
F TermorshuizenRivierduinen Institute for Mental Health, Leiden, The Netherlands.
M MarcelisDepartment of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
M A G B van PiereRivierduinen Institute for Mental Health, Leiden, The Netherlands.
I E SommerDepartment of Neuroscience and Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J P SeltenRivierduinen Institute for Mental Health, Leiden, The Netherlands.
CLOZ-NP Study Group
Maastricht University · NLGGZ Rivierduinen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLNoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To test whether: (1) psychiatrists will prescribe clozapine more often if they can delegate the monitoring tasks to an advanced nurse practitioner (ANP), (2) clozapine monitoring by an ANP is at least as safe as monitoring by a psychiatrist. Patients from 23 Dutch outpatient teams were assessed for an indication for clozapine. ANPs affiliated to these teams were randomized to Condition A: clozapine monitoring by an ANP, or Condition B: monitoring by the psychiatrist. The safety of monitoring was evaluated by determining whether the weekly neutrophil measurements were performed. Staff and patients were blinded regarding the first hypothesis. Of the 173 patients with an indication for clozapine at baseline, only seven in Condition A and four in Condition B were prescribed clozapine (Odds Ratio = 2.24, 95% CI 0.61-8.21; p = 0.225). These low figures affected the power of this study. When we considered all patients who started with clozapine over the 15-month period (N = 49), the Odds Ratio was 1.90 (95% CI 0.93-3.87; p = 0.078). With regard to the safety of the monitoring of the latter group of patients, 71.2% of the required neutrophil measurements were performed in condition A and 67.3% in condition B (OR = 0.98; CI = 0.16-3.04; p = 0.98). Identifying patients with an indication for clozapine does not automatically lead to improved prescription rates, even when an ANP is available for the monitoring. Clozapine-monitoring performed by an ANP seemed as safe as that by a psychiatrist.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringNurse PractitionersProfessional RoleAdultAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyPrescriptionsSchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineClozapineNurse practitionerOutpatientsRandomized trialTreatment-resistant schizophreniaUnderutilization

Identifiers

PMID32189094
PMCPMC7253396
OpenAlexW3011302635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.