Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32189067›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2020

How to reduce anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery-report from German expert meeting.

Andreas D Rink, Peter Kienle, Felix Aigner, Alexis Ulrich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Colorectal anastomosis dehiscence: a call for more detailed morphological classification.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas D RinkKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum Leverkusen gGmbH, Am Gesundheitspark 11, 51375, Leverkusen, Germany. andreas.rink@klinikum-lev.de.
Peter KienleKlinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig-Klinik GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
Felix AignerChirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Alexis UlrichChirurgische Klinik I, Rheinland Klinikum GmbH, Lukaskrankenhaus Neuss, Neuss, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKlinikum Leverkusen · DELukaskrankenhaus · DESt. Hedwig-Krankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAnastomotic leakage is one of the most worrisome complications in colorectal surgery. An expert meeting was organized to discuss and find a consensus on various aspects of the surgical management of colorectal disease with a possible impact on anastomotic leakage.

methodsA three-step Delphi-method was used to find consensus recommendations.

resultsStrong consensus was achieved for the use of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics prior to colorectal resections, the abundance of non-selective NSAIDs, the preoperative treatment of severe iron deficiency anemia, and for attempting to improve the patients' general performance in the case of frailty. Concerning technical aspects of rectal resection, there was a strong consensus in regard to routinely mobilizing the splenic flexure, to dividing the inferior mesenteric vein, and to using air leak tests to check anastomotic integrity. There was also a strong consensus on not to oversew the stapled anastomoses routinely, to use protective ileostomies for low rectal and intersphincteric, but not for high-rectal anastomoses. Furthermore, a consensus was reached in regard to using CT-scans with rectal contrast enema to evaluate suspected anastomotic leakage as well as measuring C-reactive protein routinely to monitor the postoperative course after colorectal resections. No consensus was found concerning the indication and technique for testing bowel perfusion, the routine use of endoscopy to check the integrity of the anastomosis, the placement of transanal drains for rectal anastomoses and the management of anastomotic leakage with peritonitis.

conclusionConsensus could be found for several practice details in the perioperative management in colorectal surgery that might have an influence on anastomotic leakage.

Indexed as

Perioperative CareAnastomotic LeakColectomyColonic DiseasesConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'ProctectomyRectal DiseasesAnastomotic failureConsensus conferenceDelphi methodLeak rate

Identifiers

PMID32189067
OpenAlexW3010727757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.