Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32189037›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2020

Quantitative phosphoproteomics to unravel the cellular response to chemical stressors with different modes of action.

Bharath Sampadi, Alex Pines, Stephanie Munk, Branislav Mišovic, Anton J de Groot, Bob van de Water, Jesper V Olsen, Leon H F Mullenders, Harry Vrieling

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bharath Sampadi *Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alex Pines *Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Stephanie MunkNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Proteomics Program, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3b, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Branislav MišovicDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anton J de GrootDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bob van de WaterDivision of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jesper V OlsenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Proteomics Program, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3b, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Leon H F MullendersDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Harry VrielingDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. h.vrieling@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3034-2664
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Copenhagen · DKLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damage to cellular macromolecules and organelles by chemical exposure evokes activation of various stress response pathways. To what extent different chemical stressors activate common and stressor-specific pathways is largely unknown. Here, we used quantitative phosphoproteomics to compare the signaling events induced by four stressors with different modes of action: the DNA damaging agent: cisplatin (CDDP), the topoisomerase II inhibitor: etoposide (ETO), the pro-oxidant: diethyl maleate (DEM) and the immunosuppressant: cyclosporine A (CsA) administered at an equitoxic dose to mouse embryonic stem cells. We observed major differences between the stressors in the number and identity of responsive phosphosites and the amplitude of phosphorylation. Kinase motif and pathway analyses indicated that the DNA damage response (DDR) activation by CDDP occurs predominantly through the replication-stress-related Atr kinase, whereas ETO triggers the DDR through Atr as well as the DNA double-strand-break-associated Atm kinase. CsA shares with ETO activation of CK2 kinase. Congruent with their known modes of action, CsA-mediated signaling is related to down-regulation of pathways that control hematopoietic differentiation and immunity, whereas oxidative stress is the most prominent initiator of DEM-modulated stress signaling. This study shows that even at equitoxic doses, different stressors induce distinctive and complex phosphorylation signaling cascades.

Indexed as

AnimalsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell DifferentiationCisplatinDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedEtoposideHumansMiceOxidative StressPhosphorylationProteomeSignal TransductionTopoisomerase II InhibitorsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCisplatinEtoposideProteomeTopoisomerase II InhibitorsCisplatinCyclosporine ADiethyl maleateEtoposidePhoshoproteomicsStress signaling

Identifiers

PMID32189037
PMCPMC7261734
OpenAlexW3010988983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.