ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2020
Reporting of acute pancreatitis by radiologists-time for a systematic change with structured reporting template.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiological and Biochemical Parameters in Assessing Acute Pancreatitis Severity: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: CT Findings, Classifications, and a Proposal of a Structured Reporting Template.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Acute pancreatitis: Structured report template of magnetic resonance imaging.World journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Prevalence and Impact of Acute Pancreatitis on Hospitalization Outcomes in a Cohort of Patients With Crohn's Disease.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2022Article
- Radiomics and Its Applications and Progress in Pancreatitis: A Current State of the Art Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Acute pancreatitis in children: a review with clinical perspectives to enhance imaging interpretation.Pediatric radiology · 2021Review
- Contextual Structured Reporting in Radiology: Implementation and Long-Term Evaluation in Improving the Communication of Critical Findings.Journal of medical systems · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis has a wide array of imaging presentations. Various classifications have been used in the past to standardize the terminology and reduce confusing and redundant terms. We aim to review the historical and current classifications of acute pancreatitis and propose a new reporting template which can improve communication between various medical teams by use of appropriate terminology and structured radiology template. The standardized reporting template not only conveys the most important imaging findings in a simplified yet comprehensive way but also allows structured data collection for future research and teaching purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.