Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32189012›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2020

A neural network approach for real-time particle/cell characterization in microfluidic impedance cytometry.

Carlos Honrado, John S McGrath, Riccardo Reale, Paolo Bisegna, Nathan S Swami, Frederica Caselli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Advances in currentFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlos HonradoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
John S McGrathDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
Riccardo RealeDepartment of Civil Engineering and Computer Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Paolo BisegnaDepartment of Civil Engineering and Computer Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Nathan S SwamiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA. nswami@virginia.edu.
Frederica CaselliDepartment of Civil Engineering and Computer Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133, Rome, Italy. caselli@ing.uniroma2.it.

Funding

The integrated Translational Health Research Institute of Virginia (iTHRIV): Using Data to Improve HealthUL1TR003015 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BROWN, DONALD E, JOHNSTON, KAREN C. · 2019 to 2023
$20.3M
Advanced Regenerative Medicine Institute, BioFab-USA T0163Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research RBSI14TX20NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003015NIH HHS UL1TR003015Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata E81I18000540005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidic applications such as active particle sorting or selective enrichment require particle classification techniques that are capable of working in real time. In this paper, we explore the use of neural networks for fast label-free particle characterization during microfluidic impedance cytometry. A recurrent neural network is designed to process data from a novel impedance chip layout for enabling real-time multiparametric analysis of the measured impedance data streams. As demonstrated with both synthetic and experimental datasets, the trained network is able to characterize with good accuracy size, velocity, and cross-sectional position of beads, red blood cells, and yeasts, with a unitary prediction time of 0.4 ms. The proposed approach can be extended to other device designs and cell types for electrical parameter extraction. This combination of microfluidic impedance cytometry and machine learning can serve as a stepping stone to real-time single-cell analysis and sorting. Graphical Abstract.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerElectric ImpedanceErythrocytesFlow CytometryHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrofluidic impedance cytometryMultiparametric characterizationNeural networksReal-time processingSingle-cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID32189012
PMCPMC8590873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.