Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32188882›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Identifying predictive features of autism spectrum disorders in a clinical sample of adolescents and adults using machine learning.

Charlotte Küpper, Sanna Stroth, Nicole Wolff, Florian Hauck, Natalia Kliewer, Tanja Schad-Hansjosten, Inge Kamp-Becker, Luise Poustka, Veit Roessner, Katharina Schultebraucks and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte KüpperDepartment of Psychiatry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. charlotte.kuepper@charite.de.
Sanna StrothDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Nicole WolffDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Florian HauckDepartment of Information Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Natalia KliewerDepartment of Information Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tanja Schad-HansjostenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Inge Kamp-BeckerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Luise PoustkaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Veit RoessnerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Katharina SchultebraucksDepartment of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5085-8249
Stefan RoepkeDepartment of Psychiatry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. stefan.roepke@charite.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DEHeidelberg University · DENew York University · USUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosing autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is a complicated, time-consuming process which is particularly challenging in older individuals. One of the most widely used behavioral diagnostic tools is the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). Previous work using machine learning techniques suggested that ASD detection in children can be achieved with substantially fewer items than the original ADOS. Here, we expand on this work with a specific focus on adolescents and adults as assessed with the ADOS Module 4. We used a machine learning algorithm (support vector machine) to examine whether ASD detection can be improved by identifying a subset of behavioral features from the ADOS Module 4 in a routine clinical sample of N = 673 high-functioning adolescents and adults with ASD (n = 385) and individuals with suspected ASD but other best-estimate or no psychiatric diagnoses (n = 288). We identified reduced subsets of 5 behavioral features for the whole sample as well as age subgroups (adolescents vs. adults) that showed good specificity and sensitivity and reached performance close to that of the existing ADOS algorithm and the full ADOS, with no significant differences in overall performance. These results may help to improve the complicated diagnostic process of ASD by encouraging future efforts to develop novel diagnostic instruments for ASD detection based on the identified constructs as well as aiding clinicians in the difficult question of differential diagnosis.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAlgorithmsAutism Spectrum DisorderDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMalePsychological TestsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySupport Vector MachineSymptom Assessment

Identifiers

PMID32188882
PMCPMC7080741
OpenAlexW3011016624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.