Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32188860›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

A single-progenitor model as the unifying paradigm of epidermal and esophageal epithelial maintenance in mice.

Gabriel Piedrafita, Vasiliki Kostiou, Agnieszka Wabik, Bartomeu Colom, David Fernandez-Antoran, Albert Herms, Kasumi Murai, Benjamin A Hall, Philip H Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recent Advances in Stem Cells of Corneal Epithelia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Epithelial architecture and signaling activity in the adult human esophagus.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ontogeny of Skin Stem Cells and Molecular Underpinnings.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriel PiedrafitaWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8701-1084
Vasiliki KostiouMRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, Box 197, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, UK.
Agnieszka WabikWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.
Bartomeu ColomWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6256-6462
David Fernandez-AntoranWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.
Albert HermsWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.
Kasumi MuraiWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.
Benjamin A HallMRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, Box 197, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, UK. bh418@mrc-cu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0355-2946
Philip H JonesWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK. pj3@sanger.ac.uk.
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17257Cancer Research UK C/609/A17257Cancer Research UK C609/A27326Medical Research Council MC_UU_12022/9Wellcome Trust 098051Wellcome Trust 296194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In adult skin epidermis and the epithelium lining the esophagus cells are constantly shed from the tissue surface and replaced by cell division. Tracking genetically labelled cells in transgenic mice has given insight into cell behavior, but conflicting models appear consistent with the results. Here, we use an additional transgenic assay to follow cell division in mouse esophagus and the epidermis at multiple body sites. We find that proliferating cells divide at a similar rate, and place bounds on the distribution cell cycle times. By including these results in a common analytic approach, we show that data from eight lineage tracing experiments is consistent with tissue maintenance by a single population of proliferating cells. The outcome of a given cell division is unpredictable but, on average, the likelihood of producing proliferating and differentiating cells is equal, ensuring cellular homeostasis. These findings are key to understanding squamous epithelial homeostasis and carcinogenesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell DivisionCell ProliferationEpidermisEsophagusFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID32188860
PMCPMC7080751
OpenAlexW3011179310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.