Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32188851›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Abundance of conserved CRISPR-Cas9 target sites within the highly polymorphic genomes of Anopheles and Aedes mosquitoes.

Hanno Schmidt, Travis C Collier, Mark J Hanemaaijer, Parker D Houston, Yoosook Lee, Gregory C Lanzaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Gene drives gaining speed.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Control of malaria-transmitting mosquitoes using gene drives.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Insects · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Next-generation gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hanno SchmidtVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8915-891X
Travis C CollierVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Mark J HanemaaijerVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Parker D HoustonVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9861-7524
Yoosook LeeVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Gregory C LanzaroVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. gclanzaro@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1190-9810

Funding

Evaluating leading GM mosquito strategies using novel A. gambiae population dynamic data and modelsR56AI130277 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LANZARO, GREGORY C. · 2018 to 2018
$627k
ACL HHS U01CK000516NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000516NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI130277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of recent papers report that standing genetic variation in natural populations includes ubiquitous polymorphisms within target sites for Cas9-based gene drive (CGD) and that these "drive resistant alleles" (DRA) preclude the successful application of CGD for managing these populations. Here we report the results of a survey of 1280 genomes of the mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae, An. coluzzii, and Aedes aegypti in which we determine that ~90% of all protein-encoding CGD target genes in natural populations include at least one target site with no DRAs at a frequency of ≥1.0%. We conclude that the abundance of conserved target sites in mosquito genomes and the inherent flexibility in CGD design obviates the concern that DRAs present in the standing genetic variation of mosquito populations will be detrimental to the deployment of this technology for population modification strategies.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectAedesAllelesAnimalsAnophelesCRISPR-Cas SystemsFemaleGene FrequencyInsect ProteinsMosquito VectorsInsect Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32188851
PMCPMC7080748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.