Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32188841›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2020

Cx43 channels and signaling via IP

Delphine Hoorelbeke, Elke Decrock, Maarten De Smet, Marijke De Bock, Benedicte Descamps, Valérie Van Haver, Tinneke Delvaeye, Dmitri V Krysko, Christian Vanhove, Geert Bultynck and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Skin capillary endothelial cells form a network of spatiotemporally conserved CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Role of Cx43 in iPSC-CM Damage Induced by Microwave Radiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Delphine HoorelbekePhysiology group, Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9088-1969
Elke DecrockPhysiology group, Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Maarten De SmetPhysiology group, Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1885-7606
Marijke De BockPhysiology group, Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Benedicte DescampsInfinity Lab, IBiTech-MEDISIP, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Valérie Van HaverPhysiology group, Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Tinneke DelvaeyePhysiology group, Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dmitri V KryskoCell Death Investigation and Therapy Laboratory, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9692-2047
Christian VanhoveInfinity Lab, IBiTech-MEDISIP, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3988-5980
Geert BultynckDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5968-4828
Luc LeybaertPhysiology group, Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. luc.leybaert@ugent.be.
Ghent University · BEKU Leuven · BESechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiotherapeutic treatment consists of targeted application of radiation beams to a tumor but exposure of surrounding healthy tissue is inevitable. In the brain, ionizing radiation induces breakdown of the blood-brain barrier by effects on brain microvascular endothelial cells. Damage from directly irradiated cells can be transferred to surrounding non-exposed bystander cells, known as the radiation-induced bystander effect. We investigated involvement of connexin channels and paracrine signaling in radiation-induced bystander DNA damage in brain microvascular endothelial cells exposed to focused X-rays. Irradiation caused DNA damage in the directly exposed area, which propagated over several millimeters in the bystander area. DNA damage was significantly reduced by the connexin channel-targeting peptide Gap26 and the Cx43 hemichannel blocker TAT-Gap19. ATP release, dye uptake, and patch clamp experiments showed that hemichannels opened within 5 min post irradiation in both irradiated and bystander areas. Bystander signaling involved cellular Ca

Indexed as

DNA DamageAdenosine TriphosphateAnimalsBrainCalciumCell LineConnexin 43Endothelial CellsHeLa CellsHumansInositol 1,4,5-TrisphosphateMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNitric OxideRatsReactive Oxygen SpeciesAdenosine TriphosphateCalciumConnexin 43Gja1 protein, ratInositol 1,4,5-TrisphosphateNitric OxideReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID32188841
PMCPMC7080808
OpenAlexW3010813869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.