Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32188774›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2020

Differential Health Care Use, Diabetes-Related Complications, and Mortality Among Five Unique Classes of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Singapore: A Latent Class Analysis of 71,125 Patients.

Jun Jie Benjamin Seng, Yu Heng Kwan, Vivian Shu Yi Lee, Chuen Seng Tan, Sueziani Binte Zainudin, Julian Thumboo, Lian Leng Low

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Prediabetes Subgroups, Type 2 Diabetes Risk, and Differential Effects of Preventive Interventions.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025 · on this map
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jun Jie Benjamin SengDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3039-3816
Yu Heng KwanProgram in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7802-9696
Vivian Shu Yi LeeSingHealth Regional Health System, Singapore Health Services, Singapore.
Chuen Seng TanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Sueziani Binte ZainudinDepartment of General Medicine (Endocrinology), Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.
Julian ThumbooProgram in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Lian Leng LowSingHealth Regional Health System, Singapore Health Services, Singapore low.lian.leng@singhealth.com.sg.ORCID 0000-0003-4228-2862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWith rising health care costs and finite health care resources, understanding the population needs of different type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patient subgroups is important. Sparse data exist for the application of population segmentation on health care needs among Asian T2DM patients. We aimed to segment T2DM patients into distinct classes and evaluate their differential health care use, diabetes-related complications, and mortality patterns. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsLatent class analysis was conducted on a retrospective cohort of 71,125 T2DM patients. Latent class indicators included patient's age, ethnicity, comorbidities, and duration of T2DM. Outcomes evaluated included health care use, diabetes-related complications, and 4-year all-cause mortality. The relationship between class membership and outcomes was evaluated with the appropriate regression models.

resultsFive classes of T2DM patients were identified. The prevalence of depression was high among patients in class 3 (younger females with short-to-moderate T2DM duration and high psychiatric and neurological disease burden) and class 5 (older patients with moderate-to-long T2DM duration and high disease burden with end-organ complications). They were the highest tertiary health care users. Class 5 patients had the highest risk of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR] 12.05, 95% CI 10.82-13.42]), end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis initiation (HR 25.81, 95% CI 21.75-30.63), stroke (HR 19.37, 95% CI 16.92-22.17), lower-extremity amputation (HR 12.94, 95% CI 10.90-15.36), and mortality (HR 3.47, 95% CI 3.17-3.80).

conclusionsT2DM patients can be segmented into classes with differential health care use and outcomes. Depression screening should be considered for the two identified classes of patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCost of IllnessDelivery of Health CareDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Disease ProgressionFemaleHealth ResourcesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID32188774
PMCPMC7171941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.