Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32188497›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Detection of enteric parasite DNA in household and bed dust samples: potential for infection transmission.

Rojelio Mejia, Victor Seco-Hidalgo, Diana Garcia-Ramon, Evelyn Calderón, Andrea Lopez, Philip J Cooper

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Detection of Parasite DNA in Soil Samples from Rural Yucatan, Mexico.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Parasitic Contamination of Soil in the Southern United States.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rojelio MejiaNational School of Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas, USA.
Victor Seco-HidalgoSchool of Medicine, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Diana Garcia-RamonSchool of Medicine, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Evelyn CalderónSchool of Medicine, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Andrea LopezSchool of Medicine, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Philip J CooperSchool of Medicine, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador. pcooper@sgul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-6871
Universidad Internacional del Ecuador · ECBaylor College of Medicine · USSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 060120/Z/99/C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnteric parasites are transmitted in households but few studies have sampled inside households for parasites and none have used sensitive molecular methods.

methodsWe collected bed and living room dust samples from households of children participating in a clinical trial of anthelmintic treatment in rural coastal Ecuador. Dust was examined for presence of DNA specific for 11 enteric parasites (Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, Ancylostoma duodenale, Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis, Toxocara canis and T. cati, Giardia lamblia, Blastocystis hominis, Cryptosporidium spp., and Entamoeba histolytica) by quantitative PCR (qPCR).

resultsOf the 38 households sampled, 37 had positive dust for at least one parasite and up to 8 parasites were detected in single samples. Positivity was greatest for B. hominis (79% of household samples) indicating a high level of environmental fecal contamination. Dust positivity rates for individual pathogens were: S. stercoralis (52%), A. lumbricoides (39%), G. lamblia (39%), Toxocara spp. (42%), hookworm (18%) and T. trichiura (8%). DNA for Cryptosporidium spp. and E. histolytica was not detected. Bed dust was more frequently positive than floor samples for all parasites detected. Positivity for A. lumbricoides DNA in bed (adjusted OR: 10.0, 95% CI: 2.0-50.1) but not floor dust (adjusted OR: 3.6, 95% CI: 0.3-37.9) was significantly associated with active infections in children.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first use of qPCR on environmental samples to detect a wide range of enteric pathogen DNA. Our results indicate widespread contamination of households with parasite DNA and raise the possibility that beds, under conditions of overcrowding in a humid tropical setting, may be a source of transmission.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsAdolescentAnimalsBedsChildControlled Clinical Trials as TopicDNADustEnvironmentFecesFemaleHumansIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticMaleParasitesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNADustBedsDustEcuadorEnteric parasitesEnvironmentFloorsProtozoaSoil-transmitted helminthsTransmission

Identifiers

PMID32188497
PMCPMC7079405
OpenAlexW3011293989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.