Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32188459›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2020

A new integrated approach for adolescent health and well-being: the AVATAR project.

Francesca Mastorci, Luca Bastiani, Gabriele Trivellini, Cristina Doveri, Cristina Vassalle, Alessandro Pingitore

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gender Differences for Health Indicators in a Sample of School Dropout Adolescents: A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Well-Being Perception during COVID-19 Pandemic in Healthy Adolescents: From the Avatar Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca MastorciClinical Physiology Institute, CNR, Via Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Luca BastianiClinical Physiology Institute, CNR, Via Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Gabriele TrivelliniClinical Physiology Institute, CNR, Via Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Cristina DoveriClinical Physiology Institute, CNR, Via Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Cristina VassalleFondazione G. Monasterio - Regione Toscana, Via Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro PingitoreClinical Physiology Institute, CNR, Via Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy. pingi@ifc.cnr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4049-184X
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITFondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited number of studies examined the relationship between factors (lifestyle, social, emotional, cognitive) affecting adolescents' health and well-being. The aims of this study were to identify the more important variables of the different components affecting adolescents' health [lifestyle habits (LH); emotional status (ES); social context (SC); and cognitive abilities (CA)], and explore the relationship between the aforementioned components.

methodsData were collected between 2017 and 2018 from 756 eligible students, recruited from 5 Italian junior high school, by using KIDSCREEN-52 and cognitive processing using the Stroop Test. School engagement was estimated through questions concerning the scholastic achievement.

resultsOf 756 adolescents, 395 were boys with a mean (SD) age of 12.19 (0.81) years. Compared to International T-value of reference group for KIDSCREEN-52, autonomy, bullying, psychological well-being and mood were lower than the reference groups, while self-perception score was higher. For LH, the most important predictor was autonomy (p < .0001). The most important aspects in the SC were the relationship with the parents (p < .0001), and the adolescent's relationships with peers (p < .0001). For ES, mood variables had the greatest contribution (p < .0001). The School performance related to Language & Literature (p < .0001) was the most important predictor in the CA latent variable. LH was positively associated with SC (p < .0001), ES (p < .0001), and CA (p < .0001). SC was positively associated with ES (p < .0001) and with CA (p < .0001).

conclusionsThis study suggests the importance of an integrated approach to characterize adolescents' health and well-being. The approach suggested here may highlight additive synergistic effects of the various components in health and well-being assessment that may not be considered with a late approach and focused only on single factors.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthHealth StatusAdolescentFemaleHumansItalyMaleParent-Child RelationsPeer GroupQuality of LifeSocial SupportStudentsAdolescentCognitive abilitiesEmotionsHealthLifestyleSocial contextWell-being

Identifiers

PMID32188459
PMCPMC7079457
OpenAlexW3012588039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.