Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32188430›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2020

Neuron ID dataset facilitates neuronal annotation for whole-brain activity imaging of C. elegans.

Yu Toyoshima, Stephen Wu, Manami Kanamori, Hirofumi Sato, Moon Sun Jang, Suzu Oe, Yuko Murakami, Takayuki Teramoto, Chanhyun Park, Yuishi Iwasaki and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Developing a Robust Multiround HCR-FISH Method Modified for Caenorhabditis elegans.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A cGAL-UAS bipartite expression toolkit forProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yu ToyoshimaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Stephen WuThe Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Research Organization of Information and Systems, Tachikawa, Tokyo, Japan.
Manami KanamoriDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi SatoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Moon Sun JangDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Suzu OeDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yuko MurakamiDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takayuki TeramotoDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Chanhyun ParkDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuishi IwasakiDepartment of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ibaraki University, Hitachi, Ibaraki, Japan.
Takeshi IshiharaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ryo YoshidaThe Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Research Organization of Information and Systems, Tachikawa, Tokyo, Japan. yoshidar@ism.ac.jp.
Yuichi IinoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. iino@bs.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-0936-2660
The University of Tokyo · JPKyushu University · JPThe Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI · JPIbaraki University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnnotation of cell identity is an essential process in neuroscience that allows comparison of cells, including that of neural activities across different animals. In Caenorhabditis elegans, although unique identities have been assigned to all neurons, the number of annotatable neurons in an intact animal has been limited due to the lack of quantitative information on the location and identity of neurons.

resultsHere, we present a dataset that facilitates the annotation of neuronal identities, and demonstrate its application in a comprehensive analysis of whole-brain imaging. We systematically identified neurons in the head region of 311 adult worms using 35 cell-specific promoters and created a dataset of the expression patterns and the positions of the neurons. We found large positional variations that illustrated the difficulty of the annotation task. We investigated multiple combinations of cell-specific promoters driving distinct fluorescence and generated optimal strains for the annotation of most head neurons in an animal. We also developed an automatic annotation method with human interaction functionality that facilitates annotations needed for whole-brain imaging.

conclusionOur neuron ID dataset and optimal fluorescent strains enable the annotation of most neurons in the head region of adult C. elegans, both in full-automated fashion and a semi-automated version that includes human interaction functionalities. Our method can potentially be applied to model species used in research other than C. elegans, where the number of available cell-type-specific promoters and their variety will be an important consideration.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCaenorhabditis elegansDatasets as TopicNeuronsBiological resourcesCaenorhabditis elegansCell-specific promotersComputational methodLarge dataset for cell positionsNeuron identificationVolumetric imagesWhole-brain activity imaging

Identifiers

PMID32188430
PMCPMC7081613
OpenAlexW3011821508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.