Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32188124›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Platelet Counting: Ugly Traps and Good Advice. Proposals from the French-Speaking Cellular Hematology Group (GFHC).

Véronique Baccini, Franck Geneviève, Hugues Jacqmin, Bernard Chatelain, Sandrine Girard, Soraya Wuilleme, Aurélie Vedrenne, Eric Guiheneuf, Marie Toussaint-Hacquard, Fanny Everaere and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of Blood Cell Count Results Between MgSOInternational journal of laboratory hematology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Impact of Shaking EDTA, Citrate, or MgSOJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Véronique BacciniLaboratoire d'hématologie, CHU de la Guadeloupe, INSERM UMR S_1134, 97159 Pointe-à-Pitre, France.
Franck GenevièveFédération Hospitalo-Universitaire 'Grand Ouest Against Leukemia' (FHU GOAL), 49033 Angers, France.
Hugues JacqminUniversité catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Laboratoire d'hématologie, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium.
Bernard ChatelainUniversité catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Laboratoire d'hématologie, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium.
Sandrine GirardHospices Civils de Lyon, Centre de biologie et pathologie Est, Service d'hématologie biologique, 69500 Bron, France.
Soraya WuillemeLaboratoire d'Hématologie, Institut de Biologie, CHU de Nantes, 44093 Nantes Cedex, France.
Aurélie VedrenneService de biologie clinique, Hôpital Foch, 92150 Suresnes, France.
Eric GuiheneufService d'Hématologie Biologique, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 80054 Amiens cedex, France.
Marie Toussaint-HacquardHématologie Biologique, CHRU Nancy, 54511 Vandoeuvre, France.
Fanny EveraereAudolys Biologie, 62219 Longuenesse, France.
Michel SoulardPlateau technique d'hématologie, Laboratoire Biogroup,92300 Levallois-Perret, France.
Jean-François LesesveHématologie Biologique, CHRU Nancy, 54511 Vandoeuvre, France.
Valérie BardetService d'Hématologie-Immunologie-Transfusion, CHU Ambroise Paré, INSERM UMR 1184, AP-HP, Université Paris Saclay, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the ongoing development of automated hematology analyzers to optimize complete blood count results, platelet count still suffers from pre-analytical or analytical pitfalls, including EDTA-induced pseudothrombocytopenia. Although most of these interferences are widely known, laboratory practices remain highly heterogeneous. In order to harmonize and standardize cellular hematology practices, the French-speaking Cellular Hematology Group (GFHC) wants to focus on interferences that could affect the platelet count and to detail the verification steps with minimal recommendations, taking into account the different technologies employed nowadays. The conclusions of the GFHC presented here met with a "strong professional agreement" and are explained with their rationale to define the course of actions, in case thrombocytopenia or thrombocytosis is detected. They are proposed as minimum recommendations to be used by each specialist in laboratory medicine who remains free to use more restrictive guidelines based on the patient's condition.

Indexed as

platelet countproposalsthrombocytopeniathrombocytosis

Identifiers

PMID32188124
PMCPMC7141345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.