Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32188044›Full record

ReviewNutrients2020

Vitamin D Supplementation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Critical Analysis of Potentials and Threats.

Julia Feige, Tobias Moser, Lara Bieler, Kerstin Schwenker, Larissa Hauer, Johann Sellner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Vitamin D and Mineral Ion Regulation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Vitamin D affects antiphospholipid syndrome by regulating T cells (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Julia FeigeDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Tobias MoserDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5397-5595
Lara BielerDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Kerstin SchwenkerDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Larissa HauerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg.
Johann SellnerDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8749-5533
Paracelsus Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS). In recent years, vitamin D has gained attention, as low serum levels are suspected to increase the risk for MS. Cholecalciferol supplementation has been tested in several clinical trials, since hypovitaminosis D was linked to higher disease activity and may even play a role in long-term outcome. Here, we review the current understanding of the molecular effects of vitamin D beyond calcium homeostasis, the potential beneficial action in MS and hazards including complications of chronic and high-dose therapy. In clinical trials, doses of up to 40,000 IU/day were tested and appeared safe as add-on therapy for short-term periods. A recent meta-analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating vitamin D as add-on therapy in MS, however, suggested that vitamin D had no therapeutic effect on disability or relapse rate. We recognize a knowledge gap for chronic and high-dose therapy, which can lead to life-threatening complications related to vitamin D toxicity including renal failure, cardiac arrythmia and status epilepticus. Moreover, vitamin D toxicity may manifest as fatigue, muscle weakness or urinary dysfunction, which may mimic the natural course of progressive MS. Given these limitations, vitamin D supplementation in MS is a sensitive task which needs to be supervised by physicians. While there is strong evidence for vitamin D deficiency and the development of MS, the risk-benefit profile of dosage and duration of add-on supplementation needs to be further clarified.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsHumansMultiple SclerosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitamin Dclinical trialsintoxicationmultiple sclerosisrenal failurevitamin D

Identifiers

PMID32188044
PMCPMC7146466
OpenAlexW3012415877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.