ArticleMolecular oncology2020
Concordance between TP53 alterations in blood and tissue: impact of time interval, biopsy site, cancer type and circulating tumor DNA burden.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA detection for personalized monitoring of treatment response in epithelial ovarian cancer.Practical laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Multi-analyte approach combining cfDNA sequencing and protein testing for early ovarian cancer detection.iScience · 2025Article
- Pretreatment circulating tumor DNA and tissue genomic profiling concordance in ovarian cancer: a prospective observational study of influencing factors and clinical implications.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Response of bilateral Wilms tumor to chemotherapy suggests histologic subtype and guides treatment.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Preoperative ctDNA Levels Are Associated With Poor Overall Survival in Patients With Ovarian Cancer.Cancer genomics & proteomics · 2023Article
- Concordance between cancer gene alterations in tumor and circulating tumor DNA correlates with poor survival in a real-world precision-medicine population.Molecular oncology · 2023Article
- Plasma ctDNA increases tissue NGS-based detection of therapeutically targetable mutations in lung cancers.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Article
- Review
- Review
- A clinician's handbook for using ctDNA throughout the patient journey.Molecular cancer · 2022Review
- The Pan-Tumor Landscape of Targetable Kinase Fusions in Circulating Tumor DNA.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022Article
- Advantages and Challenges of Using ctDNA NGS to Assess the Presence of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Solid Tumors.Cancers · 2021Review
- Liquid Biopsy in the Clinical Management of High-Grade Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer-Current Use and Future Opportunities.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We examined the impact of spatial, temporal, histologic, and quantitative factors on concordance between TP53 alterations in tissue DNA vs in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Four hundred and thirty-three patients underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) in which both tissue and blood samples were evaluated. TP53 was detected in 258 of 433 patients (59.6%); 215 had tissue TP53 alterations (49.7%); 159, ctDNA (36.7%); and 116, both tissue and ctDNA (27.8%). Overall concordance rate between ctDNA and tissue biopsies for TP53 alterations was 67.2%; positive concordance was 45.0%. Overall concordance for TP53 did not vary among patients with ≤ 2 months vs > 6 months between test samples; however, positive concordance trended higher when time intervals between test samples were shorter, suggesting that the lack of difference in overall concordance may be due to the large number of negative/negative tests. There was a trend toward higher overall concordance based on biopsy site (metastatic vs primary) (P = 0.07) and significantly higher positive concordance if the tissue biopsy site was a metastatic lesion (P = 0.03). Positive concordance significantly decreased in noncolorectal cancer patients vs colorectal cancer patients (P = 0.02). Finally, higher %ctDNA was associated with higher concordance rates between blood and tissue (P < 0.001). Taken together, these data indicate that both blood and tissue DNA sequencing are necessary to evaluate the full scope of TP53 alterations, and that concordance rates may be related to multiple factors including, but not limited to, amount of ctDNA, histologic context, and site of tissue biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.