Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32187611›Full record

ArticleDiving and hyperbaric medicine2020

Assessment of pulmonary oxygen toxicity in special operations forces divers under operational circumstances using exhaled breath analysis.

Thijs T Wingelaar, Paul Brinkman, Rigo Hoencamp, Pieter-Jan Am van Ooij, Anke-Hilse Maitland-van der Zee, Markus W Hollmann, Rob A van Hulst

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Oxygen: A Stimulus, Not "Only" a Drug.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Thijs T WingelaarDiving Medical Centre, Royal Netherlands Navy, Den Helder, the Netherlands.
Paul BrinkmanDepartment of Pulmonology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rigo HoencampDepartment of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands.
Pieter-Jan Am van OoijDiving Medical Centre, Royal Netherlands Navy, Den Helder, the Netherlands.
Anke-Hilse Maitland-van der ZeeDepartment of Pulmonology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Markus W HollmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rob A van HulstDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Royal Navy · GBAlrijne Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Netherlands Maritime Special Operations Forces use closed circuit oxygen rebreathers (O₂-CCR), which can cause pulmonary oxygen toxicity (POT). Recent studies demonstrated that volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can be used to detect POT in laboratory conditions. It is unclear if similar VOCs can be identified outside the laboratory. This study hypothesised that similar VOCs can be identified after O₂-CCR diving in operational settings.

methodsScenario one: 4 h O₂-CCR dive to 3 metres' seawater (msw) with rested divers. Scenario two: 3 h O₂-CCR dive to 3 msw following a 5 day physically straining operational scenario. Exhaled breath samples were collected 30 min before and 30 min and 2 h after diving under field conditions and analysed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to reconstruct VOCs, whose levels were tested longitudinally using a Kruskal-Wallis test.

resultsEleven divers were included: four in scenario one and seven in scenario two. The 2 h post-dive sample could not be obtained in scenario two; therefore, 26 samples were collected. GC-MS analysis identified three relevant VOCs: cyclohexane, 2,4-dimethylhexane and 3-methylnonane. The intensities of 2,4-dimethylhexane and 3-methylnonane were significantly (P = 0.048 and P = 0.016, respectively) increased post-dive relative to baseline (range: 212-461%) in both scenarios. Cyclohexane was increased not significantly (P = 0.178) post-dive (range: 87-433%).

conclusionsVOCs similar to those associated with POT in laboratory conditions were identified after operational O₂-CCR dives using GC-MS. Post-dive intensities were higher than in previous studies, and it remains to be determined if this is attributable to different dive profiles, diving equipment or other environmental factors.

Indexed as

LungAdultDivingHumansHyperoxiaNetherlandsOxygenOxygenGas chromatography-mass spectrometryGC-MSMethyl alkanesO₂-CCROxygen rebreather divingVOCsVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID32187611
PMCPMC7276273
OpenAlexW3011167860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.