Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32187271›Full record

SynthesisArchives of endocrinology and metabolism2020

Evaluation of the application of the Diabetes Quality of Life Questionnaire in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Edilene Vieira Pereira, Fernanda Stumpf Tonin, Jaqueline Carneiro, Roberto Pontarolo, Astrid Wiens

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of endocrinology and metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05703152 (Effect of a Combined Therapeutic Exercise Program on Neuropathic Pain and Perceived Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05703152 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of a Combined Therapeutic Exercise Program on Neuropathic Pain and Perceived Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaria Gabriela Aké PalomoRan2022 to 2023Enrolled12ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Neuropathic Pain, Neuropathy, DiabeticArmsCombined Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edilene Vieira PereiraDepartamento de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Fernanda Stumpf ToninDepartamento de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Jaqueline CarneiroDepartamento de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Roberto PontaroloDepartamento de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Astrid WiensDepartamento de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease with great impact on patients' quality of life (QoL). This variable can be measured using reliable, standardized, and validated instruments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the application and reporting of the Diabetes Quality of Life Measure (DQOL) or the Diabetes Quality of Life for Youths Measure (DQOLY), an adapted version for young patients with DM. Materials and methods A systematic review of interventional and observational studies using the DQOL or DQOLY was performed. Searches were conducted in the electronic databases Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs, and SciELO. Results After conducting the searches, 111 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. Of these, 32 studies were classified as interventional and 79 as observational, with 27,481 patients. The DQOL was applied in 82 studies, the DQOLY in another 27, and two studies used both instruments. DM was classified as type 1 DM in 69 studies and type 2 DM in 35 studies. Six studies included both patients. Improvement in patients' QoL after an intervention was observed in 13 interventional studies. Most of the studies (90%) provide a detailed description of the instrument and 52% the previous validation. The interpretation of the scores obtained varies among the studies, probably due to the differences inherent in cultural validations, translations, and adaptations. Conclusion The application of the instruments in clinical practice must be rigorously standardized and requires an accurate understanding of psychometric and statistical concepts. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(1):59-65.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMalePsychometricsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID32187271
PMCPMC10522290
OpenAlexW3012235358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.