Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32187099›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2020

What Is the Long-term (27- to 32-year) Survivorship of an Uncemented Tapered Titanium Femoral Component and Survival in Patients Younger Than 50 Years?

Marcus R Streit, Burkhard Lehner, David S Peitgen, Moritz M Innmann, Georg W Omlor, Tilman Walker, Christian Merle, Babak Moradi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Preliminary outcomes of the cementless UNITED hip system for primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum 2-year follow-up.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.

Marcus R StreitM. R. Streit, B. Lehner, D. S. Peitgen, M. M. Innmann, G. W. Omlor, T. Walker, C. Merle, B. Moradi, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Burkhard LehnerM. R. Streit, B. Lehner, D. S. Peitgen, M. M. Innmann, G. W. Omlor, T. Walker, C. Merle, B. Moradi, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
David S PeitgenM. R. Streit, B. Lehner, D. S. Peitgen, M. M. Innmann, G. W. Omlor, T. Walker, C. Merle, B. Moradi, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Moritz M InnmannM. R. Streit, B. Lehner, D. S. Peitgen, M. M. Innmann, G. W. Omlor, T. Walker, C. Merle, B. Moradi, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Georg W OmlorM. R. Streit, B. Lehner, D. S. Peitgen, M. M. Innmann, G. W. Omlor, T. Walker, C. Merle, B. Moradi, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tilman WalkerM. R. Streit, B. Lehner, D. S. Peitgen, M. M. Innmann, G. W. Omlor, T. Walker, C. Merle, B. Moradi, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian MerleM. R. Streit, B. Lehner, D. S. Peitgen, M. M. Innmann, G. W. Omlor, T. Walker, C. Merle, B. Moradi, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Babak MoradiM. R. Streit, B. Lehner, D. S. Peitgen, M. M. Innmann, G. W. Omlor, T. Walker, C. Merle, B. Moradi, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Defense Threat Reduction Agency · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncemented femoral components in primary THA are in widespread use, especially in patients younger than 50 years, but few studies have evaluated their survival into the late third and early fourth decade. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We evaluated (1) survivorship using femoral revision for any reason as the endpoint, (2) survivorship using femoral revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint, (3) survival in patients younger than 50 years, (4) cumulative incidence of stem revision for periprosthetic femoral fracture and (5) the overall risk of revision (change of any part of the implanted components) at a minimum of 27 years of follow-up with an uncemented tapered titanium stem still in clinical use today.

methodsWe reviewed the clinical and radiographic results of 326 THAs performed in 326 patients (for 28 patients with bilateral THA, only the first hip was included in the analysis to ensure independent observations) using an uncemented grit-blasted, tapered collarless titanium alloy (TiAl6Nb7) stem between January 1985 and December 1989. In that same timeframe, we performed 1038 primary THAs. During that time, we used cementless stems in patients without severe femoral canal deformity and adequate bone stock for uncemented femoral fixation as determined by using the indication criteria described by the developer. In all, 34% (354 of 1038) were cementless; all cementless stems implanted during that time were the stem being studied here. No others were used. The mean (range) age at the time of surgery was 56 years (13-81 years). Sixty-seven patients were younger than 50 years at the time of primary THA. A competing risk survivorship analysis was used to estimate long-term survival. The minimum follow-up was 27 years (mean 28 years; range 27-32 years); at that time, 169 patients had died, and four patients were lost to follow-up.

resultsSurvivorship at 28 years with revision of the femoral component for any reason as the endpoint was 87% (95% CI 83 to 90). Survivorship for femoral revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 94% at 28 years (95% CI 90 to 96). Survival in patients younger than 50 years at the time of primary THA was 89% (95% CI 78 to 95) and 95% (95% CI 86 to 98) at 28 years for the endpoints of all stem revisions and aseptic stem loosening, respectively. The overall cumulative incidence of stem revision for periprosthetic femoral fracture was 4% (95% CI 2 to 7) at 28 years. The overall THA survival rate at 28 years with revision for any reason as the endpoint was 57% (95% CI 51 to 62).

conclusionsUncemented femoral fixation of a tapered collarless titanium alloy stem was reliable into the early fourth decade, especially in patients younger than 50 years. Late stem failures in the third and early fourth decade were mainly because of periprosthetic femoral fracture, while aseptic loosening occurred in undersized stems during the early second decade. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Indexed as

Hip ProsthesisTitaniumAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemaleFemurHip JointHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignTi-6Al-7Nb alloyTitanium

Identifiers

PMID32187099
PMCPMC7319397
OpenAlexW3012067940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.