Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32187017›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2020

Electrochemotherapy in treatment of canine oral malignant melanoma and factors influencing treatment outcome.

Matías Nicolás Tellado, Felipe Horacio Maglietti, Sebastián Diego Michinski, Guillermo Ricardo Marshall, Emanuela Signori

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Melanoma of the dog and cat: consensus and guidelines.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Matías Nicolás TelladoVetOncologia Cancer Clinic, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Felipe Horacio MagliettiInstituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano - CONICET, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, C1199ACL, Argentina.
Sebastián Diego MichinskiInstituto de Física del Plasma, Departamento de Física, FCEyN, Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICET, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Guillermo Ricardo MarshallInstituto de Física del Plasma, Departamento de Física, FCEyN, Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICET, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Emanuela SignoriCNR-Institute of Translational Pharmacology, Roma, Italy.
University of Buenos Aires · ARFundación para la Investigación, Docencia y Prevención del Cáncer · ARInstituto Universitario Hospital Italiano · ARIstituto di Farmacologia Traslazionale · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Oral malignant melanoma is the most common, but aggressive oral cancer in dogs with poor prognosis. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) has therapeutic potential in such tumors as effective local treatment. Therefore, the aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate treatment effectiveness of ECT in as first line treatment for canine oral malignant melanoma, and search for factors influencing treatment outcome. Methods Sixty-seven canines with primary oral malignant melanoma, non-candidates for first-line therapy, were enrolled. All dogs received ECT and follow-up exams for the span of two years. Results Based on RECIST criteria, the objective response rate was 100%, 89.5%, 57.7%, and 36.4%, in stage I, II, III and IV, respectively. Only patients in stage I, II and III with partial or complete response improved their quality of life. The median time to progression was 11, 7, 4 and 4 months, and median survival time after the treatment was 16.5, 9.0, 7.5 and 4.5 months, for patients in stage I, II, III and IV, respectively. Significantly better was local response in stage I and II disease (p = 0.0013), without the bone involvement (p = 0.043) Conclusions Electrochemotherapy is effective local treatment of oral canine malignant melanoma when no alternative treatment is available. Better response is expected in stage I and II patients with tumors without bone involvement.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDog DiseasesDogsElectrochemotherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesMaleMelanomaMouth NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsTreatment Outcomecancerdogelectrochemotherapyelectroporation

Identifiers

PMID32187017
PMCPMC7087426
OpenAlexW3012480788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.